Anonymous vs. Conference Peer Feedback for EAL Writing

Published: 12 Jun 2019 | Version 1 | DOI: 10.17632/3zf5zjhgy3.1
Contributor(s):

Description of this data

Based on the interaction theory (Gass; Mackey, 2006; Long, 1996; Polio, 2012), it was hypothesised that the conference peer feedback group outperforming the anonymous peer feedback group in EAL writing. However, descriptive data showed a slight trend favouring the anonymous group, with no statistically significant difference between the two groups.
The ANTCONC files allowed the mapping of the most frequent words, collocations and combination of words present in the answers to the open-ended questions in the questionnaires.

Experiment data files

Latest version

Statistics

Views: 74
Downloads: 22

Previous versions

  • Version 2

    2019-06-12

  • Version 1

    2019-06-12

    Published: 2019-06-12

    DOI: 10.17632/3zf5zjhgy3.1

    Cite this dataset

    Zaccaron, Rafael (2019), “Anonymous vs. Conference Peer Feedback for EAL Writing”, Mendeley Data, v1 http://dx.doi.org/10.17632/3zf5zjhgy3.1

Compare to version

Institutions

Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina

Categories

English as a Second Language, Writing in English, English as a Foreign Language, Writing Process, Writing, Writing Tool

Licence

CC BY 4.0 Learn more

The files associated with this dataset are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International licence.

What does this mean?

You can share, copy and modify this dataset so long as you give appropriate credit, provide a link to the CC BY license, and indicate if changes were made, but you may not do so in a way that suggests the rights holder has endorsed you or your use of the dataset. Note that further permission may be required for any content within the dataset that is identified as belonging to a third party.

Report