IQ-TREE multicore version 1.6.8 for Mac OS X 64-bit built Oct 28 2018 Developed by Bui Quang Minh, Nguyen Lam Tung, Olga Chernomor, Heiko Schmidt, Dominik Schrempf, Michael Woodhams. Host: DJMLabMac.wireless.yale.internal (AVX2, FMA3, 16 GB RAM) Command: iqtree -s 28s_BLAST-genbankCalanoida_reduced.phy -m MFP -mset mrbayes -bb 1000 -nt 2 Seed: 990694 (Using SPRNG - Scalable Parallel Random Number Generator) Time: Wed Feb 27 17:18:03 2019 Kernel: AVX+FMA - 2 threads (8 CPU cores detected) Reading alignment file 28s_BLAST-genbankCalanoida_reduced.phy ... Phylip format detected Alignment most likely contains DNA/RNA sequences WARNING: 22 sites contain only gaps or ambiguous characters. Alignment has 116 sequences with 1164 columns, 743 distinct patterns 476 parsimony-informative, 211 singleton sites, 477 constant sites Gap/Ambiguity Composition p-value 1 Acanthodiaptomus_pacificus 27.32% passed 50.59% 2 Acrocalanus_longicornis 65.12% passed 42.29% 3 Aetideus_armatus 43.38% passed 42.09% 4 Arctodiaptomus_salinus 30.24% passed 43.21% 5 Arctodiaptomus_wierzejskii 30.24% passed 84.15% 6 Bathycalanus_princeps 43.47% passed 94.79% 7 Calanipeda_aquaedulcis 29.73% passed 48.30% 8 Calanoides_carinatus 39.43% passed 98.55% 9 Calanus_finmarchicus 17.01% passed 80.63% 10 Calanus_helgolandicus 43.38% passed 55.98% 11 Calanus_hyperboreus 39.09% passed 98.81% 12 Calanus_pacificus 43.81% passed 62.28% 13 Calanus_propinquus 43.81% passed 64.43% 14 Calanus_sinicus 28.18% passed 93.64% 15 Calocalanus_curtus 65.12% passed 11.24% 16 Calocalanus_minutus 65.12% passed 23.07% 17 Calocalanus_plumulosus 65.21% failed 2.13% 18 Calocalanus_styliremis 65.12% passed 34.43% 19 Candacia_simplex 41.92% passed 45.26% 20 Centropages_abdominalis 39.26% passed 49.20% 21 Centropages_furcatus 35.65% passed 80.03% 22 Centropages_violaceus 43.38% passed 52.15% 23 Clausocalanus_arcuicornis 44.42% passed 15.68% 24 Copidodiaptomus_numidicus 30.24% passed 84.02% 25 Cosmocalanus_darwinii 19.50% passed 89.42% 26 Ctenocalanus_vanus 40.89% passed 98.85% 27 Delibus_nudus 65.12% passed 60.60% 28 Diaixis_hibernica 43.21% passed 81.03% 29 Diaptomus_castor 30.07% passed 99.29% 30 Diaptomus_cyaneus 30.24% passed 88.97% 31 Diaptomus_kenitraensis 30.24% passed 90.91% 32 Diaptomus_mirus 30.24% passed 91.86% 33 Disseta_scopularis 56.19% passed 74.10% 34 Epischura_baikalensis 28.61% passed 96.87% 35 Epischura_chankensis 21.91% passed 56.54% 36 Epischura_fluviatilis 21.74% passed 59.69% 37 Epischura_lacustris 21.74% passed 53.69% 38 Epischura_nevadensis 21.74% passed 43.20% 39 Epischura_nordenskioldi 26.98% passed 61.67% 40 Euchaeta_indica 40.64% passed 87.93% 41 Euchaeta_rimana 40.64% passed 88.23% 42 Eudiaptomus_vulgaris 30.24% passed 84.56% 43 Foxtonia_barbatula 43.21% passed 62.95% 44 Haloptilus_longicornis 43.21% passed 69.77% 45 Heliodiaptomus_kikuchii 26.37% passed 89.74% 46 Hemirhabdus_grimaldii 56.19% passed 94.49% 47 Heterocope_septentrionalis 21.65% passed 56.75% 48 Heterorhabdus_papilliger 56.19% passed 92.44% 49 Heterostylites_longicornis 56.19% passed 97.03% 50 Hyalopontius_typicus 41.84% failed 0.01% 51 Hyperbionyx_athesphatos 43.38% passed 33.20% 52 Limnocalanus_macrurus 35.22% passed 73.60% 53 Lucicutia_flavicornis 43.38% passed 65.52% 54 Mecynocera_clausi 40.89% passed 66.92% 55 Mesorhabdus_brevicaudatus 56.19% passed 91.40% 56 Metridia_effusa 43.47% passed 93.12% 57 Metridia_longa 39.00% passed 72.55% 58 Metridia_lucens 39.18% passed 72.49% 59 Metridia_pacifica 39.09% passed 61.31% 60 Microcalanus_pygmaeus 39.00% passed 96.90% 61 Nannocalanus_minor 65.12% passed 60.44% 62 Neocalanus_cristatus 39.00% passed 98.76% 63 Neocalanus_flemingeri 39.00% passed 98.47% 64 Neocalanus_gracilis 65.12% passed 84.30% 65 Neocalanus_plumchrus 39.00% passed 98.05% 66 Neocalanus_robustior 65.12% passed 77.91% 67 Neodiaptomus_schmackeri 26.63% passed 77.01% 68 Neorhabdus_latus 56.19% passed 94.49% 69 Nullosetigera_auctiseta 43.90% passed 91.24% 70 Paracalanus_aculeatus 65.12% passed 58.53% 71 Paracalanus_denudatus 42.70% passed 22.16% 72 Paracalanus_indicus 44.33% passed 62.78% 73 Paracalanus_parvus 16.07% passed 44.52% 74 Paracalanus_tropicus 44.33% passed 21.55% 75 Paraeuchaeta_glacialis 39.18% passed 98.41% 76 Paraeuchaeta_norvegica 39.86% passed 98.42% 77 Paraheterorhabdus_compactus 43.38% passed 77.32% 78 Paraugaptilus_buchani 43.04% passed 65.65% 79 Pareucalanus_attenuatus 65.21% passed 35.00% 80 Phaenna_spinifera 40.46% passed 41.33% 81 Pinkertonius_ambiguus 43.30% passed 5.41% 82 Pleuromamma_abdominalis 41.24% passed 31.43% 83 Pleuromamma_xiphias 41.24% passed 30.36% 84 Pontellina_plumata 40.81% passed 35.24% 85 Pseudocyclops_juanibali 38.49% failed 1.99% 86 Pseudocyclops_schminkei 42.18% passed 11.27% 87 Pseudodiaptomus_inopinus 15.21% passed 17.72% 88 Pseudodiaptomus_marinus 26.29% passed 95.55% 89 Pseudodiaptomus_nihonkaiensis 26.37% passed 97.23% 90 Rhincalanus_cornutus 43.47% passed 18.10% 91 Rhincalanus_nasutus 41.15% passed 27.89% 92 Rhincalanus_rostrifrons 41.07% passed 15.82% 93 Scolecithrix_bradyi 43.47% passed 53.12% 94 Scolecithrix_danae 41.49% passed 52.59% 95 Sinocalanus_tenellus 26.80% passed 81.33% 96 Sinodiaptomus_sarsi 26.37% passed 91.30% 97 Spinocalanus_abyssalis 43.30% passed 23.98% 98 Spinocalanus_angusticeps 41.41% passed 81.49% 99 Spinocalanus_elongatus 39.18% passed 33.83% 100 Spinocalanus_horridus 38.92% passed 26.46% 101 Spinocalanus_spinosus 41.32% passed 62.25% 102 Subeucalanus_crassus 65.21% passed 45.15% 103 Subeucalanus_pileatus_1 65.21% passed 12.67% 104 Subeucalanus_pileatus_2 43.47% passed 64.60% 105 Subeucalanus_subcrassus 65.21% passed 12.92% 106 Subeucalanus_subtenuis 41.15% passed 65.29% 107 Sulcanus_conflictus 43.56% passed 98.43% 108 Temora_discaudata 19.33% passed 41.52% 109 Temora_longicornis 39.86% passed 69.03% 110 Temora_turbinata 26.55% passed 60.24% 111 Temorites_brevis 43.47% passed 94.17% 112 Temoropia_mayumbaensis 43.30% passed 99.79% 113 Tharybis_groenlandica 43.30% passed 72.23% 114 Tigriopus_japonicus 20.53% passed 98.50% 115 Tortanus_gracilis 42.27% passed 93.05% 116 Undeuchaeta_major 41.49% passed 84.55% WARNING: 20 sequences contain more than 50% gaps/ambiguity **** TOTAL 40.80% 3 sequences failed composition chi2 test (p-value<5%; df=3) NOTE: Neorhabdus_latus is identical to Hemirhabdus_grimaldii but kept for subsequent analysis Create initial parsimony tree by phylogenetic likelihood library (PLL)... 0.025 seconds NOTE: ModelFinder requires 30 MB RAM! ModelFinder will test 78 DNA models (sample size: 1164) ... No. Model -LnL df AIC AICc BIC 1 JC 20296.647 229 41051.293 41164.077 42209.946 2 JC+I 19261.059 230 38982.118 39096.008 40145.830 3 JC+G4 18558.278 230 37576.555 37690.446 38740.267 4 JC+I+G4 18522.146 231 37506.292 37621.296 38675.064 5 JC+R2 18727.617 231 37917.234 38032.238 39086.006 6 JC+R3 18553.133 233 37572.266 37689.517 38751.157 7 JC+R4 18511.722 235 37493.445 37612.970 38682.455 8 JC+R5 18508.167 237 37490.334 37612.161 38689.463 14 F81+F 20349.651 232 41163.302 41279.426 42337.133 15 F81+F+I 19305.340 233 39076.680 39193.931 40255.571 16 F81+F+G4 18611.701 233 37689.401 37806.653 38868.292 17 F81+F+I+G4 18574.386 234 37616.771 37735.157 38800.722 18 F81+F+R2 18764.448 234 37996.896 38115.281 39180.846 19 F81+F+R3 18606.644 236 37685.287 37805.960 38879.357 20 F81+F+R4 18558.359 238 37592.718 37715.706 38796.907 21 F81+F+R5 18558.220 240 37596.440 37721.770 38810.748 27 K2P 19738.995 230 39937.989 40051.880 41101.701 28 K2P+I 18684.590 231 37831.180 37946.184 38999.951 29 K2P+G4 17945.961 231 36353.923 36468.927 37522.694 30 K2P+I+G4 17909.579 232 36283.159 36399.283 37456.990 31 K2P+R2 18117.502 232 36699.003 36815.128 37872.834 32 K2P+R3 17943.232 234 36354.464 36472.850 37538.415 33 K2P+R4 17896.135 236 36264.270 36384.943 37458.340 34 K2P+R5 17896.102 238 36268.204 36391.193 37472.393 40 HKY+F 19788.668 233 40043.335 40160.587 41222.226 41 HKY+F+I 18695.829 234 37859.658 37978.043 39043.609 42 HKY+F+G4 17954.665 234 36377.330 36495.716 37561.281 43 HKY+F+I+G4 17914.564 235 36299.128 36418.654 37488.139 44 HKY+F+R2 18125.785 235 36721.571 36841.096 37910.581 45 HKY+F+R3 17952.033 237 36378.065 36499.892 37577.194 46 HKY+F+R4 17899.096 239 36276.193 36400.349 37485.441 47 HKY+F+R5 17898.974 241 36279.948 36406.460 37499.316 53 SYM 19523.095 234 39514.189 39632.575 40698.140 54 SYM+I 18556.463 235 37582.927 37702.452 38771.937 55 SYM+G4 17830.928 235 36131.856 36251.382 37320.866 56 SYM+I+G4 17801.958 236 36075.916 36196.590 37269.986 57 SYM+R2 17986.855 236 36445.710 36566.383 37639.780 58 SYM+R3 17834.631 238 36145.261 36268.249 37349.450 59 SYM+R4 17786.059 240 36052.119 36177.449 37266.427 60 SYM+R5 17785.936 242 36055.872 36183.572 37280.299 66 GTR+F 19534.592 237 39543.184 39665.012 40742.314 67 GTR+F+I 18544.353 238 37564.706 37687.694 38768.895 68 GTR+F+G4 17809.124 238 36094.248 36217.236 37298.437 69 GTR+F+I+G4 17781.850 239 36041.701 36165.857 37250.949 70 GTR+F+R2 17972.099 239 36422.198 36546.354 37631.446 71 GTR+F+R3 17817.407 241 36116.815 36243.327 37336.183 72 GTR+F+R4 17765.813 243 36017.625 36146.521 37247.112 73 GTR+F+R5 17765.709 245 36021.418 36152.725 37261.024 Akaike Information Criterion: GTR+F+R4 Corrected Akaike Information Criterion: GTR+F+R4 Bayesian Information Criterion: GTR+F+R4 Best-fit model: GTR+F+R4 chosen according to BIC All model information printed to 28s_BLAST-genbankCalanoida_reduced.phy.model.gz CPU time for ModelFinder: 80.577 seconds (0h:1m:20s) Wall-clock time for ModelFinder: 43.301 seconds (0h:0m:43s) Generating 1000 samples for ultrafast bootstrap (seed: 990694)... NOTE: 14 MB RAM (0 GB) is required! Estimate model parameters (epsilon = 0.100) 1. Initial log-likelihood: -18764.401 2. Current log-likelihood: -17838.821 3. Current log-likelihood: -17813.793 4. Current log-likelihood: -17806.900 5. Current log-likelihood: -17802.394 6. Current log-likelihood: -17798.813 7. Current log-likelihood: -17795.679 8. Current log-likelihood: -17792.901 9. Current log-likelihood: -17790.434 10. Current log-likelihood: -17788.247 11. Current log-likelihood: -17786.298 12. Current log-likelihood: -17784.562 13. Current log-likelihood: -17783.015 14. Current log-likelihood: -17781.622 15. Current log-likelihood: -17780.362 16. Current log-likelihood: -17779.246 17. Current log-likelihood: -17778.495 18. Current log-likelihood: -17777.985 19. Current log-likelihood: -17777.802 20. Current log-likelihood: -17777.540 Optimal log-likelihood: -17777.402 Rate parameters: A-C: 0.71193 A-G: 1.85554 A-T: 0.93376 C-G: 0.67696 C-T: 4.87482 G-T: 1.00000 Base frequencies: A: 0.229 C: 0.241 G: 0.303 T: 0.227 Site proportion and rates: (0.448,0.086) (0.220,0.571) (0.227,1.782) (0.105,4.107) Parameters optimization took 20 rounds (5.040 sec) Computing ML distances based on estimated model parameters... 0.238 sec Computing BIONJ tree... 0.011 seconds Log-likelihood of BIONJ tree: -17808.419 -------------------------------------------------------------------- | INITIALIZING CANDIDATE TREE SET | -------------------------------------------------------------------- Generating 98 parsimony trees... 2.085 second Computing log-likelihood of 98 initial trees ... 3.940 seconds Current best score: -17754.311 Do NNI search on 20 best initial trees Estimate model parameters (epsilon = 0.100) BETTER TREE FOUND at iteration 1: -17719.088 Estimate model parameters (epsilon = 0.100) BETTER TREE FOUND at iteration 2: -17716.987 Iteration 10 / LogL: -17718.280 / Time: 0h:0m:22s Iteration 20 / LogL: -17718.906 / Time: 0h:0m:27s Finish initializing candidate tree set (15) Current best tree score: -17716.987 / CPU time: 22.237 Number of iterations: 20 -------------------------------------------------------------------- | OPTIMIZING CANDIDATE TREE SET | -------------------------------------------------------------------- Estimate model parameters (epsilon = 0.100) BETTER TREE FOUND at iteration 22: -17714.041 Estimate model parameters (epsilon = 0.100) BETTER TREE FOUND at iteration 24: -17703.627 Iteration 30 / LogL: -17729.198 / Time: 0h:0m:33s (0h:1m:47s left) Iteration 40 / LogL: -17710.255 / Time: 0h:0m:38s (0h:1m:23s left) Iteration 50 / LogL: -17706.515 / Time: 0h:0m:44s (0h:1m:6s left) Log-likelihood cutoff on original alignment: -17776.263 Estimate model parameters (epsilon = 0.100) BETTER TREE FOUND at iteration 60: -17703.169 Iteration 60 / LogL: -17703.169 / Time: 0h:0m:49s (0h:1m:23s left) Iteration 70 / LogL: -17736.113 / Time: 0h:0m:54s (0h:1m:10s left) Estimate model parameters (epsilon = 0.100) BETTER TREE FOUND at iteration 71: -17702.714 Iteration 80 / LogL: -17707.497 / Time: 0h:0m:59s (0h:1m:8s left) Iteration 90 / LogL: -17703.319 / Time: 0h:1m:4s (0h:0m:58s left) Estimate model parameters (epsilon = 0.100) BETTER TREE FOUND at iteration 91: -17702.193 Iteration 100 / LogL: -17748.432 / Time: 0h:1m:9s (0h:1m:4s left) Log-likelihood cutoff on original alignment: -17763.232 NOTE: Bootstrap correlation coefficient of split occurrence frequencies: 0.986 NOTE: UFBoot does not converge, continue at least 100 more iterations Iteration 110 / LogL: -17714.471 / Time: 0h:1m:14s (0h:1m:1s left) Estimate model parameters (epsilon = 0.100) BETTER TREE FOUND at iteration 118: -17700.795 Iteration 120 / LogL: -17700.898 / Time: 0h:1m:19s (0h:1m:5s left) Estimate model parameters (epsilon = 0.100) UPDATE BEST LOG-LIKELIHOOD: -17700.730 UPDATE BEST LOG-LIKELIHOOD: -17700.722 Iteration 130 / LogL: -17702.014 / Time: 0h:1m:25s (0h:0m:58s left) Iteration 140 / LogL: -17701.538 / Time: 0h:1m:31s (0h:0m:51s left) Iteration 150 / LogL: -17717.337 / Time: 0h:1m:38s (0h:0m:44s left) Log-likelihood cutoff on original alignment: -17763.232 Iteration 160 / LogL: -17716.275 / Time: 0h:1m:44s (0h:0m:38s left) Iteration 170 / LogL: -17702.129 / Time: 0h:1m:49s (0h:0m:31s left) Iteration 180 / LogL: -17702.516 / Time: 0h:1m:55s (0h:0m:24s left) Iteration 190 / LogL: -17702.628 / Time: 0h:2m:0s (0h:0m:17s left) Estimate model parameters (epsilon = 0.100) BETTER TREE FOUND at iteration 196: -17699.293 Iteration 200 / LogL: -17754.428 / Time: 0h:2m:6s (0h:1m:1s left) Log-likelihood cutoff on original alignment: -17757.283 NOTE: Bootstrap correlation coefficient of split occurrence frequencies: 0.995 Estimate model parameters (epsilon = 0.100) BETTER TREE FOUND at iteration 201: -17698.740 Estimate model parameters (epsilon = 0.100) UPDATE BEST LOG-LIKELIHOOD: -17698.666 Iteration 210 / LogL: -17754.257 / Time: 0h:2m:15s (0h:0m:59s left) UPDATE BEST LOG-LIKELIHOOD: -17698.659 UPDATE BEST LOG-LIKELIHOOD: -17698.654 Estimate model parameters (epsilon = 0.100) BETTER TREE FOUND at iteration 219: -17698.294 Iteration 220 / LogL: -17752.267 / Time: 0h:2m:22s (0h:1m:4s left) Iteration 230 / LogL: -17722.741 / Time: 0h:2m:28s (0h:0m:57s left) Estimate model parameters (epsilon = 0.100) BETTER TREE FOUND at iteration 234: -17697.902 Iteration 240 / LogL: -17702.255 / Time: 0h:2m:35s (0h:1m:1s left) Estimate model parameters (epsilon = 0.100) BETTER TREE FOUND at iteration 249: -17697.235 Iteration 250 / LogL: -17701.799 / Time: 0h:2m:41s (0h:1m:4s left) Log-likelihood cutoff on original alignment: -17757.283 Iteration 260 / LogL: -17708.728 / Time: 0h:2m:47s (0h:0m:57s left) Iteration 270 / LogL: -17702.203 / Time: 0h:2m:53s (0h:0m:50s left) Estimate model parameters (epsilon = 0.100) UPDATE BEST LOG-LIKELIHOOD: -17697.172 Iteration 280 / LogL: -17705.026 / Time: 0h:2m:59s (0h:0m:44s left) UPDATE BEST LOG-LIKELIHOOD: -17697.165 Iteration 290 / LogL: -17709.005 / Time: 0h:3m:5s (0h:0m:37s left) Iteration 300 / LogL: -17722.623 / Time: 0h:3m:10s (0h:0m:31s left) Log-likelihood cutoff on original alignment: -17757.283 NOTE: Bootstrap correlation coefficient of split occurrence frequencies: 0.991 Iteration 310 / LogL: -17702.813 / Time: 0h:3m:16s (0h:0m:57s left) Iteration 320 / LogL: -17699.455 / Time: 0h:3m:21s (0h:0m:50s left) Iteration 330 / LogL: -17702.868 / Time: 0h:3m:26s (0h:0m:43s left) Iteration 340 / LogL: -17698.926 / Time: 0h:3m:31s (0h:0m:37s left) Iteration 350 / LogL: -17697.993 / Time: 0h:3m:37s (0h:0m:31s left) Log-likelihood cutoff on original alignment: -17757.283 TREE SEARCH COMPLETED AFTER 350 ITERATIONS / Time: 0h:3m:38s -------------------------------------------------------------------- | FINALIZING TREE SEARCH | -------------------------------------------------------------------- Performs final model parameters optimization Estimate model parameters (epsilon = 0.010) 1. Initial log-likelihood: -17697.165 2. Current log-likelihood: -17697.131 3. Current log-likelihood: -17697.086 4. Current log-likelihood: -17697.040 5. Current log-likelihood: -17696.996 6. Current log-likelihood: -17696.954 7. Current log-likelihood: -17696.914 8. Current log-likelihood: -17696.875 9. Current log-likelihood: -17696.838 10. Current log-likelihood: -17696.802 11. Current log-likelihood: -17696.767 12. Current log-likelihood: -17696.733 13. Current log-likelihood: -17696.700 14. Current log-likelihood: -17696.668 15. Current log-likelihood: -17696.637 16. Current log-likelihood: -17696.606 17. Current log-likelihood: -17696.577 18. Current log-likelihood: -17696.548 19. Current log-likelihood: -17696.520 20. Current log-likelihood: -17696.503 21. Current log-likelihood: -17696.475 22. Current log-likelihood: -17696.458 23. Current log-likelihood: -17696.431 24. Current log-likelihood: -17696.415 25. Current log-likelihood: -17696.389 26. Current log-likelihood: -17696.374 27. Current log-likelihood: -17696.359 28. Current log-likelihood: -17696.344 29. Current log-likelihood: -17696.329 30. Current log-likelihood: -17696.314 31. Current log-likelihood: -17696.300 32. Current log-likelihood: -17696.286 33. Current log-likelihood: -17696.272 34. Current log-likelihood: -17696.258 35. Current log-likelihood: -17696.244 36. Current log-likelihood: -17696.230 37. Current log-likelihood: -17696.217 38. Current log-likelihood: -17696.204 39. Current log-likelihood: -17696.191 40. Current log-likelihood: -17696.180 41. Current log-likelihood: -17696.169 42. Current log-likelihood: -17696.157 43. Current log-likelihood: -17696.146 44. Current log-likelihood: -17696.135 45. Current log-likelihood: -17696.123 46. Current log-likelihood: -17696.112 47. Current log-likelihood: -17696.101 48. Current log-likelihood: -17696.090 Optimal log-likelihood: -17696.075 Rate parameters: A-C: 0.69525 A-G: 1.90270 A-T: 0.94608 C-G: 0.67099 C-T: 5.06992 G-T: 1.00000 Base frequencies: A: 0.229 C: 0.241 G: 0.303 T: 0.227 Site proportion and rates: (0.369,0.039) (0.280,0.430) (0.249,1.714) (0.102,4.301) Parameters optimization took 48 rounds (9.201 sec) BEST SCORE FOUND : -17696.075 Creating bootstrap support values... Split supports printed to NEXUS file 28s_BLAST-genbankCalanoida_reduced.phy.splits.nex Total tree length: 7.094 Total number of iterations: 350 CPU time used for tree search: 378.788 sec (0h:6m:18s) Wall-clock time used for tree search: 212.875 sec (0h:3m:32s) Total CPU time used: 407.078 sec (0h:6m:47s) Total wall-clock time used: 227.994 sec (0h:3m:47s) Computing bootstrap consensus tree... Reading input file 28s_BLAST-genbankCalanoida_reduced.phy.splits.nex... 116 taxa and 646 splits. Consensus tree written to 28s_BLAST-genbankCalanoida_reduced.phy.contree Reading input trees file 28s_BLAST-genbankCalanoida_reduced.phy.contree Log-likelihood of consensus tree: -17698.751 Analysis results written to: IQ-TREE report: 28s_BLAST-genbankCalanoida_reduced.phy.iqtree Maximum-likelihood tree: 28s_BLAST-genbankCalanoida_reduced.phy.treefile Likelihood distances: 28s_BLAST-genbankCalanoida_reduced.phy.mldist Ultrafast bootstrap approximation results written to: Split support values: 28s_BLAST-genbankCalanoida_reduced.phy.splits.nex Consensus tree: 28s_BLAST-genbankCalanoida_reduced.phy.contree Screen log file: 28s_BLAST-genbankCalanoida_reduced.phy.log Date and Time: Wed Feb 27 17:22:35 2019