Other (please specify)
Greater organisational focus on peer-reviewed papers
The papers will be more focused and hence of higher quality
I believe that this will be the result of higher demand
with less pressure on admin work I will be able to concentrate more on real reaserch
My research will have more impact in the scientific community. Wewere more effiicient in the work and dissemination of results
Research study is complex and with many objetives
I will have to apply for a tenure track position, but I just started a post-doc. In these post-doctoral years I will increase my production to be more competitive and increase my chances to obtain a new position. It is a nightmare, but it is the only way to proceed in academia.
material that would otherwise be saved up for big books will be published in smaller increments, in articles, for example.
I will be able to publish different aspects of studies.
I think producing more papers per research study is not necessarily a bad thing. One could do so by exploring different interpretations of the data
More content to my cv might pay off at some point...
I have built my own team, and all together we are working quicker and qualitativer than me alone.
Hopefully in the future my projects will be larger
the longer one has done research, the more material is remembered, so it takes less time to do certain aspects of research (books/articles already read)
Technological advancements will facilitate the conducting and writing of research papers.
to diversify the means of popularization
we will hopefully have different scheme for publishing papers with less overhead
Better planning and allocation of resources
I will work more efficiently and collaborate better
expecting more unbiased or blind folded peer review process
With proper planning and sufficient funding the balance between quality and quantity may be maintained.
i will develop bigger research team which will produce more papers.
I will have more funding and bigger team
I will become more effective per unit of time worked
Become more efficient and get better students (hope)
Every time there is more pressure to publish more, demeriting the quality of papers
I will have more research collaborators and students.
I don-t like when the quantity affect the quality.
more focused design of work towards publication
More papers are resulting from mor complex projects, which could be a future goal
more collaborations that will increase the quality and quantity of the work
Data takes longer to collect; therefore, more creativity in producing research papers will be required.
research groups will be larger and research more intensive
Speed of work results into more deliverables. Here is it is publication.
advanced technology reduce time of work and give accurat results
the development of investigative tools will allow us to work more quickly...
My experiance is growing both, in experiments and papers writing
We have collected a lot of data, that are unpublished over the previous decade, that will have serious impact on the area.
I will have more international and national colaborations
more relevant scientific results to publish
My expertise and the number of active collaborators will increase
If technology to process research is more efficient, then it is easier to have more details to report from a single research than now
I will wroks in more subjects to publish
I won't take as long for writing one paper. I am a young researcher.
I will become more influential in y field
I will have to have an army of RAs to do the hard work and that is why I will need more funding.
changes in technology (data processing and so on) can help to increase possibility publish more papers.
The consequence will be faster advance of science
I will become faster and more effective in producing papers as my experience grows
I will need to collaborate more with others
Papers represent and will represent the primary index for assessing the research.
increase in research experience and a larger group
If the number is important, I will split the papers
This was rather a personal wish to improve as a researcher and to be able to publish more efficiently...
There is a limited amount of data you can present in the article to make it readable. Therefore higher efficiency and amount of data will results in more potential articles with more specifies agendas
At this moment, I'm not doing many publications
New technologies allow you to perform work faster.
I will place a higher priority on this work.
this statement is predicated on the ability to receive more funding. At present, my publications are restricted by my need to continue to conduct research and complete projects so we can obtain funding.
I hope the difficulties of publishing will be less
As an emerging researcher I wish to increase my publications.
Experience in scientific writing will be higher
Publication is part of my learning process. I expect that it will take me less time for the same quality in the future.
We have more funds and more people in our team
By publishing negative results, more manuscripts will consume the writing pipeline.
I hope to be contributing to scientific and academic development
share with others my many years' accumulation on research and latest findings for better enlightening and deployment.
New research fields can result more publications
I mean different paper not same paper in different journal!!! I hope to get more funds and increase the publication rate.
new approcahes or methodologies and technological advances will facilitate faster results
I hope that in the future I will lose less time for communication with dishonest reviewers.
I untake the research step by step.Every step, I want to contribute me paper for discussion with collegues. te step by step
I expect better quality of research and higher review and publication standards.
the stakes for publications and numbers of papers increases almost monthly
To not have these bad consequences, researchs need to be done in groups and with high planned methods.
it will be necessary in order to continue to get funding
I will need to alot more time to writing and scholarly activity
I will prioritize publication more highly the further I advance in my career.
there will be more information and access to information
multi-centre trials w higher potential for publications
More grants, more results and important papers
I will be faster because I´m learning a lot now.
The publishing process will be vastly different from today’s. AI will prescreen every submitted article and send detailed feedback on how to improve the manuscript linguistically or with additional data. Publishing will hence become easier. It’s the long time delays between submission and review that makes publishing so stressful. Researchers will learn from this feedback and be able to generate better research and better publications. The end result is more publications.
Development in technologies make it possible to explore more aspects of problems and questions during less time. It means more scientific research articles.
I need to expand my influence.I need to expand my influence.
The effect of technology on research will be to allow more infromation to be produced per project and, by definition, will allow for the publication of more articles. It does not necessarily follow that more papers means less quality.
Our research studies would produce more robust results that can not be relflected in one paper.
because research studies will be more completed
I will use more advanced technical means
Quality of produced research and time spent on it will be reduced.
My research projects are much longer than 10 years. Projects are maturing.
I have identifyed other fields where my ideas have high impact.
There are more peer reviewed publishing companies to publish research findings.
it will be easier to publish in more journals
I will focus more on creating papers that illustrate small advances and that extend the theoretical models based on the findings of each study.
I'm assuming the availability of more publication outlets via electroni publication options.
I will become a more skillful researcher and will know how to get the most out of any research project.
I will have a more numerous research team that will help to publish more
More time for writing, more people helping collecting data
Because it the papers are more planned from the beginning of a study now than ten years ago in my field.
My children are getting older, which gives me more time to devote to research.
University will demand more high quality papers per annum
If we changed the peer review process and published more articles open source, then there may be no more impact......
I will spend less time working on the operational side of my job
The amount is not that important but currently I am not satisfied on my productivity for various reasons
The findings of my research will be shared, available and replicable for more researchers and organization who will be interested to work in the same research area. It may contribute in helping funding organizations and philanthropists to spend more on soceital cause. It may also assist the other researchers to go to my each reseach questions and findings more specifically.
Not necessarily more papers but a commitment to publish
I hope that I will have more colleagues to work with
Publishing is a collaborative effort and requires both researchers as well as publishing setups (journals). So they would also need to improve and increase in numbers.
I will become better at it and therefore be able to produce more.
Mis publicaciones serán el resultado de trabajos en equipos más amplios.
Be more productive to cope with people's need to behave in a more informed way
Many institutions grade the publications. They give more importance to papers rather than teaching or management.
I will work more effectively and publish more papers. So, no impact
the selected issues could exist with researchers publishing one paper under one project as well. some researchers combine several research pieces into one big and strong paper, but other researchers like me consider a positive consequence to separate independent research pieces in several papers to maximize the value for funding organization who will be promoted and mentioned in each of my papers.
my unlimited fantasy stimulate proliferation of my ideas in the form of papers y
information publication will be more diverse
The objectivity and applicability of findings would increase and technology helps researchers to write more articles.
I hope to have more time for research than now.
Papers become unsubstantial (one study cut into a million pieces), but unfortunately publications are still what make or break your career
as a researcher matures he or she can produce more research papers
Total amount of knowledge in the field would increase.
The pressure on researchers will increase to publish more papers due to the competitiveness of financial funds.
As knowledge of a subject matter matured in ones mind, more meaningful work can be accomplished in s given time period. Thus, more publications
Depends on the project funding and project work
I would have funds to support my research so I can work harder to achieve new things.
Increased technology allows more usable data to be collected from experiments.
I'm transitioning from being a Ph.D. student to a faculty member, so I'll be working more and producing more papers.
more time will be available for communicating artiles
There will be pressure from funders for more publishing
There will be more adequate technology to enable more publications which will however get to more Readers.
if I get more findings from my study then due to some page limitations I can publish more than one paper
That means that with the aid of technology and appropriate funding the academic production will be higher than now
The number of author per paper will increase
I will get more experience writing papers
Promotion to higher position depend to so many articles
The research field will be wider and will allow publication of several papers
More information for all the people, includins non scientifics ones
more technology would have emerged and understanding of statistical tools for analysis
Career advancement and possibility to establish my own group
I design projects/proposals with that aim from the beginning
Any research work depends on financial backing to carry out and I feel, in the future there will be more funding for research works, as the society is getting more prone to more complicated diseases, availability of advanced technology.
It will improve the return (results) of research investments.
papers are more focused on a particular aspect than they used to be. They are read faster.
We are improving our labs capacity and quality

Other (please specify)
it is easier to measure quantity than quality
bibliometric indexes based on production measures
I didn't realize this is meant to apply to me. I think there will be more pressure on most researchers.
in order to keep my job I must produce more and criteria for the position is getting higher
Problems in society will be desided to be solved as soon as possible.
Evaluations to determine the researcher's productivity
Currently, a higher number of articles indicates you are a better researcher, which is not always true.
Use of researchers' metrics to fund projects.
governement evaluation is quantity here in Brazil
I am not conscious of having stated that. In fact, I think that impact is becoming more important than number in the last years
the speed with which the changing world imposes a higher work rate.
better technologies will encourage more outputs
both is important; and the reason for more paper in that I have more fresh student, they need to be educated and well training
Profession as whole will have more publications per individual and that puts pressure on everybody to publish more.
too much competition for too little money drives people to meet unrealistic expectations
Requirements from Universities in order to get a better ranking
Collectively the research endeavour leads to higher and higher rates of publication
A university that I teach will require to release funding
Let me explain: Probably I do not take the question clearly. I mean the pressure is getting higher for publishing more higher quality articles
Argentinean competitivity and low gubernamental fundings
Institution’s Office of Research Services (VP Research)
Wider dissemination to wider audiences is important
There will be many more low impact journals in the future, providing more opportunities to publish
requirement for promotion in the University
don't remember that question, don't agree
national systems for the evaluation of our productivity
I don't necessarily think that publishing more papers will decrease their quality
Less papers, less chances to land a job in research
It is not desirable, but t seems unfortunately to be the trend
university hiring / tenure / promotion committees
univ department heads and peer reviewers
The pressure to publish is always there, and the modes of publication seem to be increasing
Changing norms and desire for prestige/advancement
REF system in the UK - controls allocation of funding
REF (the UK assessment of research in universities)
The government, who fund the universities
Competition among research institutes on funds and status
rules of the system: my career depends on a periodic assessment process by public institutions. One of the most important factor is the number of pubblications
basically, many researchers are negatively affected by the lack of financial, social and academic support to publish high quality papers.
It is becoming harder and harder to publish. The amount of data required to publish would have equaled 2 or more papers just 10 years ago. I don't understand where this comes from but it is the truth not only for high impact journals but lower impact journals as well. yet, the demands for our careers and for obtaining funding, require that we publish even more. it's a catch 22 and this is why labs are closing down all over the country.
I think I meant that 'more high quality articles' will be the pressure
quality of new idea is better than quality of standard paper without brilliant idea
note it's a combination of higher quality & more publications which will have increased in 10 years
I agree with the pressure to publish more research articles but with high quality
Research outcomes will lead to more recommendations
more accessibility and more visibility will allow for a larger field of view.
I think more you work you can publish more. For high quality research articles, it depends on quality of works.

Other (please specify)
increased knowledge and understanding only if it leads to societal changes
as a work in the agricultural sector and, directly with a specific chain (yerba mate), my doctorate is currently aimed at meeting the demand of nursery workers (seedlings producers), which will have an impact on the final quality of the product
Deeper scientific understanding, more subtlety of thought
My field of study is applied linguistics, so I hope my research will have an impact on this field in my country
move animal research from genetics to mechanism
biodiversity protections and quantifying human impacts
protect the environment and its natural sources
More stability and assurance of digital applications.
Improve the academic capacitation on research
more available data and more open acces journals
increased sustainability of human activities
improved sustainability, not only for people but also for biodiversity
Increase knowledge, not necessarily for the main public.
Better risk management of financial institutions
Possible revolutionary approach to research practices and even commercial activity.
Impacting community stakeholders, a smaller subset of society
applied research - improvements in practice at the organizational level
Aplicabilidad de los resultados por parte de las poblaciones estudiadas y sus organizaciones.
benefit to the communities and stakeholders that I research
change and improve lifestyle as well as solve or at least minimize serious growing problems
critical reflection on society and health care (as two distinct domains)
Appropriate organisation and funding structures
Education at highschool and university elvels
Transition to more sustainable societies
Digitization cuts across all of them, and not always positively.
proper use of evaluation methods in education
help to think creatively on public issues
Improved environmental quality and farmers' income
Improved quality of digital tools for work
Need for new frontiers in a developing economy

Other (please specify)
improved environment and agricultural efficiency
reduced poverty, reduced environmental harm
Changes in practices that lead to environmental benefits alongside improved productivity
More efficient use of water and nutrient resources
increase in the quality of the yerba mate seedlings produced, which will reflect the quality of the yerba mate produced
better understanding of the content of contemporary physics
Deeper and richer understanding of the human past; correction of past prejudices and injustices
Impact on the public in terms of changes in attitudes
Qualitiative developmental and educational impact
cultural awareness among the public at large and my students
greater understanding of culture and societ
attention to social issues/ inequalities
replication of successful educational/social practices
better knowledge about our space enviroment
pure science shouldn't be measured in terms of benefit. The benefit is increase in human knowledge itself
Understading of our universe and how galaxies form and evolve
I am an astronomer; we don't have impact they way other areas do.
manifold improved health of older/elderly persons
Attention: data that was used; Benefits: better methods and quality of science
sate human curiosity. Expand knowledge of the world.
understanding the molecular basis of life
Time, i.e interest in the results produced long in the future
Basic research does not need a direct impact. In long term can affect all the items
Increase in knowledge about how the natural world works, and the impacts of humans on wildlife
Increasing our knowledge of evolutionary changes and how species adapt to environmental changes
biodiversity protections, quantifying human impacts on wildlife/protected species
Understanding of the natural system and how it is affected by natural factors or human activities. Support adequate legislation towards the environment
Increased understanding of how evolution by natural selection works.
Conservation and knowledge of nature functioning
Changes to management of natural landscapes.
Improve public awareness about biodiversity conservation
Better life quality and environment protection
better understanding of practices in organizations
Risk gor health and environment reduction
General better understanding by scientist
I think research impact needs to be evaluated on a case-by-case basis and can not be "measured" by metrics such as publication or citation counts etc.
Citations to my conference proceedings publications
forecasts of climate change and society development
Financial and welfare benefits to society
better understanding of economic phenomena
achieving objectives more effectively and efficiently
better life quality, better enviromental conditions
Determination of the causes of natural phenomena.
More effective, and evidence based actions by organizations, governments, etc. that IMPROVE outcomes (biodiversity and environment in my case)
better understanding of environmental change
People engaged, projects implemented, climate change adaptation strategies embedded into planing, increases in biodiversity
environmental cleanup of contaminants reduces risk to human health and ecosystem
Reduced negative environmental measures (e.g. reduced species losses)
An increased understanding of climate change impacts is expected to contribute toward emergency preparedness and planning .
environmental protection and saving lives
To understand our materials universe better
Better management of financial institutions. Less volatility or insolvency
Long term benefit to scientific knowledge.
Research keeps me up-to-date so that I can be a better university teacher.
small contribution to a better understanding of the phyical world
As all basic science I expect that the results can be applied um other fields
Improved nutritional content of food products.
changes in timeline of clinical intervention - early detection
comparative measures with other animal species
Better understanding of the laws of nature
increase in the fundamental understanding of this universe we live in
citations are not the best measure of an impact
A deeper understanding of the phenomena involved in the field of photovoltaics
deeper understanding of how Nature works, with many possible springoffs
Attention to new areas in scientific studies, especially related to experimental protocols and methodology.
Improved quality of life, compassion, empathy.
Most of these options are irrelevant to my field
A more diplomatic world. Improved international relations.
changes to quality of life of research users and participants
More research based on my study findings/recommendations
world peace through better communication
Increased diversity, equity, and inclusion in STEM fields
The quality of education of young people
changed practice ion my professional field
building capacity among stakeholders and engagement between different stakeholder groups
public events, changes to public discourse, changes to collecting institutions'
changing mindsets, problematizing already set belief within academia and research
solve and minimize sustainability issues
better basic understanding, better products, increased quality of life, better teaching
increased knowledge and cross-cultural understanding
Ultimately I hope my research imporves public understandings of science and yields actions informed by those deeper understandings, especially as related to energy and climate (go big or go home).
impact on students, publications in top conferences, visibility through talks and collaborations
increased functional Independence for elderly and disabled persons
decreased morbidity; increased working career
reflection on public health practice and clinical ethics
Increases in wellbeing of people and the environment
Improved & faster plant breeding for desirable traits
Greater learner and teacher satisfaction
Changes to industry and organisational practice
giving presentations to policy makers, civil servants, mayors, police etc will help them to better understand their day to day job
to improve the quality of education provision
practitioners feedbacks, future funding of my work, size of my network, number of practitioners who wish to collaborate
Pointing out flaws in systems previously believed to be secure
better understanding of metabolic processes
increase safety of process and installations
Better understanding of the basic concepts
Novel products, improved environmental quality, and improved farming practices
reduction of the impacts of construction/rehabilitation
Improved national security and increased commercial activity in space.
Implementation of practices by governmental agencies.
Better understanding of physical phenomenon
changes induced in education, new collaborations, knowledge transferred ...

Other (please specify):
environmental data are not subject to identical land use and climate over time
My field is applied linguistics, I worked on language teaching/learning in Tunisia, and the Editor told me that the work is not of interest to international readership; it is rather interesting only at the local level (i.e. in Tunisia)
some publication contains wrong or inadequate results
Realization of each workstep was not perfectly clear
the explanations in previous studies were not detailed or complete
Methodological details were not included
we were using a different sample, in hope of achieving the same results but, this is not the case..
Some results were similar; some were not
Publication was just a collection of artifacts, wrong data analysis, and a concept, that was not validated. Publication was in Cell...
We tried to reproduce a mouse study of one of our collaborators and could not. We believe that the differences in the animal facilities (ours and his) make a big difference in the animal study. This is very difficult to control and is likely an issue for the ability to reproduce all animal studies...every animal facility is different and that will be reflected in the animal study.
The results were technically demanding to repeat and the methods described were sketchy

Other (please specify)
Public Health, Biostatistics and Epidemiology
science communication / public engagement
Business, Humanities, Social Sciences and Interdisciplinary Sustainability Sciences
I specialize in geoscience education, meaning that I specialize in both Earth and Planetary Sciences and Social Science
Development studies, culture, health care
Transdisciplinary (social science, environmental, economics, humanities, energy, psychology
ecology, remote sensing, military sciences, earth sciences, etc
What do you deny interdisciplinary research. It is imposible to put three or more fields of interest
This question is flawed, in that it only allows for one discipline to be selected. I have published in Mathematics, Computer Science, Physics, Linguistics, & Cognitive Science
Library and information science and information literacy
interdisciplinary research on mental health and work
Mix: Chemistry, Energy, Materials science
Biostatistics, mainly in bioequivalence studies
Earth and Planetary Sciences and Environmental Sciences
GIS and Statistics in veterinary epidemiology

Other (please specify)
Faculty and Graduate Program Coordinator
researcher without permanent contract (research fellow)
Currently conducting research based on data independently
Researcher in a public college. Professor
None. I am currently not enrolled in any organization.
I just finish my PhD and I am unemployed
I do my research outside of any organization
Full Professor um a Public Brazilian University
Adjunct (Part-time) Assistant Professor at the University & Research Associate to a research center
Assistant Professor (Department of Sociology)
I research on my own time (not a part of an institution)
Director (unpaid) and researcher (short term contract)
Retired. Have heldall positions in university from Assistant Professor

Other (please specify)
I am retired, but still active in research
teaching, supervision of PG students, research and admin
None. I am currently not enrolled in any organization.
Combination of management, R&D, and chief scientist (writing reports and articles)
I am associate professor & HOD oral & maxillofacial of Islam dental college Sialkot pakistan
Two organizations: research and teaching
Research capacity development for postgraduates
Teaching at the University and research at the research center
Research & Teaching, you can not separate that
Educator professional development and associated research
Research, Teaching and Mqanagement in equal proportions
again professor are enttitled to have more than one field of interest. Your questionnaire is quite porr in that sense
guidance and supervision of MA and PHD students, and researchers
President. Teaching. Researcher. All positions in University

Other (Please specify)
I have two fixed contracts - one of both goups
contractor (emplyed by other thsn organisation I work for). Permanent contract with third party
dependent upon my ability to continually obtain grant funding
None. I am currently not enrolled in any organization.
Graduate assistantship for the duration of my PhD program
There is no contract. If I get an R01, I can stay. If I don't, I'm out of a job and my lab closes down.
Permanent, but if my assignments as coordinator ends and I do not fins research funding, I am out.
token contract, almost no money not research grants or facilities

Other (Please specify)
None. I am currently not enrolled in any organization.
Government Research and Development Agency
I have worked for gov. research lab., University, consultant, and now as CEO of a startup
National Council for Science and Technology
research institutions (i.e. universities& NGOs\IGOs)
Co-operative educational and research charitable institution
Differs by project, e.g. Swiss National Science Foundation or the UNDP Peru Office.