2026-10-15T09:32:41Z https://data.mendeley.com/oai

oai:data.mendeley.com/455hmm7ykz.1 2026-09-17T12:15:08Z

Baranovski, Sergey Coding dataset for a structured review of automated layup constraints, manufacturing deviations and structural response in curvilinearly reinforced composite structures Mendeley Data This dataset contains the complete coding tables underlying a structured review of how the literature on automated fibre placement and automated tape laying connects manufacturing constraints, the deviations they give rise to, the structural consequences of those deviations, and feedback into the design problem. Two independent layers are provided. The prevalence layer records six implementation indicators and five causal links for a corpus of 167 publications, of which full texts were obtained for 147; proportions are accompanied by assumption-free bounds rather than confidence intervals, because full-text availability was non-random. The mechanism-and-effect layer is a purposively assembled matrix of 91 comparisons extracted from 44 publications, coded by effect class, reference state, direction of comparison, response level, deviation type and origin, fidelity level and the provenance of each reported value. The dataset also contains the screening log for 814 publications, the frozen analytical set of 476, the pilot validation blocks that established the accuracy of coding from bibliographic records, the claim ledger mapping every generalising statement onto the identifiers of the comparisons that support it, the discrepancy register, the metric harmonisation map, the comparison-direction adjudication, the gap-test log, a changelog of two corrections made after the data freeze, and an audit trail from which every numerical value reported in the article can be recomputed. The dataset is entirely in English: identifiers, codes, flags, numerical fields, column names and all free-text provenance, adjudication and interpretation fields. A README with a per-file catalogue and a column glossary is included. Provenance of the values. Every numerical value and every classification in these tables was extracted and verified by the author from the primary sources. A large language model was used only to move information already present in bibliographic records into the fields of the extraction sheet and to assemble comparative tables from fields that had already been coded. No effect class, reference state, comparison direction, fidelity level or numerical magnitude was assigned by a model, and no inclusion decision was made by a model. The accuracy of the dataset does not depend on any tool other than the author's verification against the primary sources. Composite Material Manufacturing Process Reinforced Composite Systematic Review Composite Structure Structural Analysis Dataset doi:10.17632/455hmm7ykz.1 oai:data.mendeley.com/455hmm7ykz.1 Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 https://data.mendeley.com/datasets/455hmm7ykz 2026-09-17T12:15:08Z