<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="/oai-pmh-repository/static/oai2.xsl"?>
<OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd">
    <responseDate>2026-10-13T16:48:18Z</responseDate>
    <request verb="GetRecord" identifier="oai:data.mendeley.com/4pw8whvkb2.1" metadataPrefix="oai_dc">https://data.mendeley.com/oai</request>
    <GetRecord>
        <record>
            <header>
                <identifier>oai:data.mendeley.com/4pw8whvkb2.1</identifier>
                <datestamp>2018-07-03T17:40:44Z</datestamp>
            </header>
            <metadata><oai_dc:dc xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">
    <dc:creator>ping, Zhou</dc:creator>
    <dc:title>Data for: Mechanism of nitric oxide and acid-sensing ion channel 1a modulation of panic-like behaviour in the dorsal periaqueductal grey </dc:title>
    <dc:publisher>Mendeley Data</dc:publisher>
    <dc:description>Fig. 1. Photograph of the study apparatus.
Fig. 2. Effects of SNAP infusion (10 or 20 nmol/0.2 μl) in the dPAG on ethological and spatiotemporal measures. (A) Freezing time; (B) stretched-attend posture (SAP); (C) time in contact with the grid wall; and (D) time in the protected area. Significant differences between the treatment and control groups were determined via one-way ANOVA and Dunnett’s multiple comparison procedure (* P &lt; 0.05, ** P &lt; 0.01, and *** P &lt; 0.001 compared with the control group injected with vehicle. n = 8-10 mice/group).
Fig. 3. Effects of L-NAME infusion (100 or 300 nmol/0.2 μl) in the dPAG on ethological and spatiotemporal measures. (A) Freezing time; (B) stretched-attend posture (SAP); (C) time in contact with the grid wall; and (D) time in the protected area. Significant differences between the treatment and control groups were determined via one-way ANOVA and Dunnett’s multiple comparison procedure (** P &lt; 0.01 and *** P &lt; 0.001 compared with the control group injected with vehicle. n = 8-10 mice/group).
Fig. 4. Effects of PcTx-1 infusion (20 or 50 ng/0.2 μl) in the dPAG on ethological and spatiotemporal measures. (A) Freezing time; (B) stretched-attend posture (SAP); (C) time in contact with the grid wall; and (D) time in the protected area. Significant differences between the treatment and control groups were determined via one-way ANOVA and Dunnett’s multiple comparison procedure (* P &lt; 0.05 and ** P &lt; 0.01 compared with the control group injected with vehicle. n = 8-10 mice/group). 
Fig. 5. Effects of SNAP treatment on ASIC1a, p-CaMKIIα, and CaM expression levels in the dPAG. Representative Western blot image (A) and results of quantification of the expression levels of ASIC1a (B), p-CaMKIIα (C) and CaM (D) in the vehicle control (0) and SNAP treatment groups. Significant differences between the treatment and control groups were determined via one-way ANOVA and Dunnett’s multiple comparison procedure (*P &lt; 0.05 and **P &lt; 0.01 compared with the control group). 
Fig. 6. Effects of L-NAME treatment on ASIC1a, p-CaMKIIα, and CaM expression levels in the dPAG. Representative Western blot image (A) and results of quantification of the expression levels of ASIC1a (B), p-CaMKIIα (C) and CaM (D) in the vehicle control (0) and SNAP treatment groups. Significant differences between the treatment and control groups were determined via one-way ANOVA and Dunnett’s multiple comparison procedure (*P &lt; 0.05 and **P &lt; 0.01 compared with the control group). 
Fig. 7. Effects of PcTx-1 treatment on p-CaMKIIα and CaM expression levels in the dPAG. Representative Western blot image (A) and analysis to quantify the expression levels of p-CaMKIIα (B) and CaM (C) in the vehicle control (0) and SNAP treatment groups. Significant differences between the treatment and control groups were determined via one-way ANOVA and Dunnett’s multiple comparison procedure (*P &lt; 0.05 compared with the control group). 
</dc:description>
    <dc:subject>Biological Psychiatry</dc:subject>
    <dc:contributor>huaisha, Xu</dc:contributor>
    <dc:type>Dataset</dc:type>
    <dc:identifier>doi:10.17632/4pw8whvkb2.1</dc:identifier>
    <dc:identifier>oai:data.mendeley.com/4pw8whvkb2.1</dc:identifier>
    <dc:rights>Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 Unported</dc:rights>
    <dc:rights>https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0</dc:rights>
    <dc:relation>https://data.mendeley.com/datasets/4pw8whvkb2</dc:relation>
    <dc:date>2018-07-03T17:40:44Z</dc:date>
</oai_dc:dc></metadata>
        </record>
    </GetRecord>
</OAI-PMH>
