<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="/oai-pmh-repository/static/oai2.xsl"?>
<OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd">
    <responseDate>2026-10-13T02:13:41Z</responseDate>
    <request verb="GetRecord" identifier="oai:data.mendeley.com/67ncspgz8n.1" metadataPrefix="oai_dc">https://data.mendeley.com/oai</request>
    <GetRecord>
        <record>
            <header>
                <identifier>oai:data.mendeley.com/67ncspgz8n.1</identifier>
                <datestamp>2017-11-17T18:49:40Z</datestamp>
            </header>
            <metadata><oai_dc:dc xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">
    <dc:creator>Smith, Spencer</dc:creator>
    <dc:title>Software Quality Grades for Seismology Software</dc:title>
    <dc:publisher>Mendeley Data</dc:publisher>
    <dc:description>The data provides a summary of the state of development practice for seismology software (as of August 2017). The summary is based on grading a set of 30 seismology products using a template of 56 questions based on 13 software qualities. The software qualities were further divided into 4 aspects: product, implementation, design and process.

The template used to grade the software is found in GradingTemplatedDocument.pdf file. Each quality is measured with a series of questions. For unambiguity the responses are quantified wherever possible (e.g. yes/no answers). The goal is for measures that are visible, measurable and feasible in a short time with limited domain knowledge. Unlike a comprehensive software review, this template does not grade on functionality and features. Therefore, it is possible that a relatively featureless product can outscore a feature-rich product.

A virtual machine is used to provide an optimal testing environments for each software product. During the process of grading the 30 software products, it is much easier to create a new virtual machine to test the software, rather than using the host operating system and file system.

The raw data obtained by measuring each software product is in SoftwareGrading-Seismology.xlsx. Each line in this file corresponds to between 2 and 4 hours of measurement time by a software engineer. The overall impression scores for each product are summarized in one of the tabs in AHP_seismology.xlsx spreadsheet.  These overall impression numbers are then used for a relative comparison between products.  The relative comparison is used to populate the AHP tables.  Using the mathematics for AHP the numbers are then converted to a ranking of the 30 software products on each of the 13 qualities, and each of the 4 aspects.
</dc:description>
    <dc:subject>Software Quality Assessment</dc:subject>
    <dc:contributor>Carette, Jacques</dc:contributor>
    <dc:type>Dataset</dc:type>
    <dc:identifier>doi:10.17632/67ncspgz8n.1</dc:identifier>
    <dc:identifier>oai:data.mendeley.com/67ncspgz8n.1</dc:identifier>
    <dc:rights>Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International</dc:rights>
    <dc:rights>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0</dc:rights>
    <dc:relation>https://data.mendeley.com/datasets/67ncspgz8n</dc:relation>
    <dc:date>2017-11-17T18:49:40Z</dc:date>
</oai_dc:dc></metadata>
        </record>
    </GetRecord>
</OAI-PMH>
