<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="/oai-pmh-repository/static/oai2.xsl"?>
<OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd">
    <responseDate>2026-10-15T18:05:27Z</responseDate>
    <request verb="GetRecord" identifier="oai:data.mendeley.com/687sdyxwgs.1" metadataPrefix="oai_dc">https://data.mendeley.com/oai</request>
    <GetRecord>
        <record>
            <header>
                <identifier>oai:data.mendeley.com/687sdyxwgs.1</identifier>
                <datestamp>2019-01-08T13:38:01Z</datestamp>
            </header>
            <metadata><oai_dc:dc xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">
    <dc:creator>Besnier, Florent</dc:creator>
    <dc:title>HRVFIT2 study database</dc:title>
    <dc:publisher>Mendeley Data</dc:publisher>
    <dc:description>The aim of this study was to verify the superiority of high-intensity interval training (HIIT) to enhance parasympathetic activity, cardiorespiratory fitness and cardiac function when compared to moderate intensity continuous training (MICT) in a short and intense cardiac rehabilitation program (RP).
Methods: This is a prospective, monocentric, evaluator-blinded, randomized (1 :1) study with a two arm parallel group design. 31 voluntary chronic heart failure (CHF) patients (LVEF &lt; 45 %) were included either to MICT (n=15) or HIIT group (n=16) for a short RP (27 ± 4 days). They underwent, at entry and at the end of the study, a 24-hour ECG recording, an echocardiography and a cardiopulmonary exercise test. Results: The High-Frequency power (HFnu, %) measured with HRV increased in HIIT group (from 21.2 to 26.4 %, p&lt;0.001) but remained unchanged in MICT group (from 23.1 to 21.9 %, p=0.444) with significant inter-group difference: p=0.003. Resting heart rate (24-h Holter ECG) decreased significantly in both groups (from 68.2 to 64.6 bpm and from 66.0 to 63.5 bpm for MICT and HIIT respectively, without inter-group difference: p=0.578). No difference in premature ventricular contractions was observed between groups. V̇O2peak improvement was greater after HIIT when compared to MICT (+21 % vs +5% respectively, p=0.009). LVEF only improved in HIIT group (from 36.2 to 39.5 %, p=0.034). </dc:description>
    <dc:subject>Exercise Physiology</dc:subject>
    <dc:subject>Cardiovascular System</dc:subject>
    <dc:subject>Cardiovascular Disease</dc:subject>
    <dc:subject>Heart Rate Variability</dc:subject>
    <dc:subject>Exercise Rehabilitation</dc:subject>
    <dc:subject>Chronic Heart Failure</dc:subject>
    <dc:type>Dataset</dc:type>
    <dc:identifier>doi:10.17632/687sdyxwgs.1</dc:identifier>
    <dc:identifier>oai:data.mendeley.com/687sdyxwgs.1</dc:identifier>
    <dc:rights>Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International</dc:rights>
    <dc:rights>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0</dc:rights>
    <dc:relation>https://data.mendeley.com/datasets/687sdyxwgs</dc:relation>
    <dc:date>2019-01-08T13:38:01Z</dc:date>
</oai_dc:dc></metadata>
        </record>
    </GetRecord>
</OAI-PMH>
