<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="/oai-pmh-repository/static/oai2.xsl"?>
<OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd">
    <responseDate>2026-10-15T13:49:47Z</responseDate>
    <request verb="GetRecord" identifier="oai:data.mendeley.com/7z93nccwsm.1" metadataPrefix="oai_dc">https://data.mendeley.com/oai</request>
    <GetRecord>
        <record>
            <header>
                <identifier>oai:data.mendeley.com/7z93nccwsm.1</identifier>
                <datestamp>2026-09-24T23:27:31Z</datestamp>
            </header>
            <metadata><oai_dc:dc xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">
    <dc:creator>Liu, shoutong</dc:creator>
    <dc:title>Surficial slides accelerate retreat velocity of retrogressive breaching failure</dc:title>
    <dc:publisher>Mendeley Data</dc:publisher>
    <dc:description> Existing formulas for submarine face-retreat velocity are formulated for, and validated against, time-averaged, grain-by-grain breaching conditions; we hypothesized that they systematically underestimate the retreat velocity during surficial sliding events, and that this underestimation grows with the position along the face. The pointwise comparison confirms this: at the grain-by-grain level all three formulas reproduce the measured velocities only weakly (R² &lt; 0, negligible or negative correlation), indicating that their parameters were calibrated for aggregated rather than pointwise retreat. During surficial sliding the discrepancy is larger and, critically, the enhancement ratio E = v_measured/v_e is not constant but increases with height above the toe H (r ≈ +0.78) and decreases with the local face angle α (r ≈ −0.57). We therefore introduce a height-dependent correction, v_SF = v_e + δ₀ + c(H/H₀)^d, where the constant δ₀ = −0.248 cm/s captures a systematic baseline offset and the power-law term c(H/H₀)^0.61 (c = 0.532) represents the additional transport driven by the sliding wedge, whose thickness and potential energy grow with height. This model explains 54% of the pointwise variance (R² = 0.542, RMSE = 0.094 cm/s) and is preferred over the constant-correction model by ΔAIC = 105. To interpret and reuse the data: (i) columns in each spreadsheet are defined in the README; (ii) the isSF flag in S2 labels each observation as grain-by-grain (0) or surficial-slide (1) according to the five events in the manuscript; (iii) a measured SF velocity can be predicted from the corresponding Eq.(3) velocity v_e and the point height H using Eq.(4); and (iv) the full pipeline can be rerun from S1 with the MATLAB scripts in /MATLAB_scripts.</dc:description>
    <dc:subject>Ocean Engineering</dc:subject>
    <dc:subject>Coastal Erosion</dc:subject>
    <dc:subject>Experimental Approaches in Oceanography</dc:subject>
    <dc:type>Dataset</dc:type>
    <dc:identifier>doi:10.17632/7z93nccwsm.1</dc:identifier>
    <dc:identifier>oai:data.mendeley.com/7z93nccwsm.1</dc:identifier>
    <dc:rights>Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International</dc:rights>
    <dc:rights>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0</dc:rights>
    <dc:relation>https://data.mendeley.com/datasets/7z93nccwsm</dc:relation>
    <dc:date>2026-09-24T23:27:31Z</dc:date>
</oai_dc:dc></metadata>
        </record>
    </GetRecord>
</OAI-PMH>
