<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="/oai-pmh-repository/static/oai2.xsl"?>
<OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd">
    <responseDate>2026-10-15T21:03:10Z</responseDate>
    <request verb="GetRecord" identifier="oai:data.mendeley.com/93cp6hntfx.2" metadataPrefix="oai_dc">https://data.mendeley.com/oai</request>
    <GetRecord>
        <record>
            <header>
                <identifier>oai:data.mendeley.com/93cp6hntfx.2</identifier>
                <datestamp>2022-10-04T12:59:49Z</datestamp>
            </header>
            <metadata><oai_dc:dc xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">
    <dc:creator>Barr, Shiri</dc:creator>
    <dc:title>Godeano-Barr et al. DCI dataset</dc:title>
    <dc:publisher>Mendeley Data</dc:publisher>
    <dc:description>We examined the effects of a mindfulness-informed conflict transformation intervention (“Mind the Conflict” – MtC) on the approach of teachers and students towards engaging with classroom discussions on controversial issues (DCIs), and on students’ experience in such discussions. Specifically, we examined 3 constructs: Mindfulness in Conflict (manipulation check, only teachers); Motivation to engage in DCIs (including willingness, self-capacity, attribution of importance for dealing with controversial issues and sense of legitimacy (the latter – only for teachers); and Conduct/Behaviour of teachers and students during such discussions.
Teachers and students from four schools were randomized into an experimental and active control conditions and completed pre- and post-intervention self-report questionnaires. Interventions included teachers’ training and engagement in two classroom DCIs. After each discussion, students completed a short questionnaire about their experience during the DCI.</dc:description>
    <dc:subject>Teacher Assessment</dc:subject>
    <dc:subject>Student Attitude</dc:subject>
    <dc:subject>Student Behavior</dc:subject>
    <dc:subject>Classroom Discourse Analysis</dc:subject>
    <dc:contributor>Reifen Tagar, Michal</dc:contributor>
    <dc:contributor>Tarrasch, Ricardo</dc:contributor>
    <dc:contributor>levit-binnun, nava</dc:contributor>
    <dc:type>Dataset</dc:type>
    <dc:identifier>doi:10.17632/93cp6hntfx.2</dc:identifier>
    <dc:identifier>oai:data.mendeley.com/93cp6hntfx.2</dc:identifier>
    <dc:rights>Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International</dc:rights>
    <dc:rights>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0</dc:rights>
    <dc:relation>https://data.mendeley.com/datasets/93cp6hntfx</dc:relation>
    <dc:date>2022-10-04T12:59:49Z</dc:date>
</oai_dc:dc></metadata>
        </record>
    </GetRecord>
</OAI-PMH>
