<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="/oai-pmh-repository/static/oai2.xsl"?>
<OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd">
    <responseDate>2026-10-16T07:03:53Z</responseDate>
    <request verb="GetRecord" identifier="oai:data.mendeley.com/hw7nxs6fw8.1" metadataPrefix="oai_dc">https://data.mendeley.com/oai</request>
    <GetRecord>
        <record>
            <header>
                <identifier>oai:data.mendeley.com/hw7nxs6fw8.1</identifier>
                <datestamp>2026-06-03T19:20:53Z</datestamp>
            </header>
            <metadata><oai_dc:dc xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">
    <dc:creator>Khalaf, Younes</dc:creator>
    <dc:title> Inequities in Access to Rehabilitation Services in Ninevah</dc:title>
    <dc:publisher>Mendeley Data</dc:publisher>
    <dc:description>Data were gathered through face-to-face, interviewer-administered questionnaires conducted by trained research assistants who were proficient in the local dialects. The questionnaire consisted of several key sections.

Sociodemographic Characteristics: This section collected essential demographic information, including age, sex, educational attainment, household income, ethnicity, and displacement status (e.g., internally displaced persons, returnees, and host community members).

Rehabilitation Service Utilization: The primary outcome variable was assessed using a dichotomous (Yes/No) question that asked participants whether they had ever used any formal rehabilitation services during their lifetime.

Perceived Barriers to Access: Perceived barriers were evaluated using a 12-item scale rated on a 5-point Likert response format ranging from 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree). The items were specifically developed to reflect the five dimensions of access proposed by the Penchansky and Thomas “5 A’s of Access” framework, allowing for a comprehensive assessment of the various challenges encountered by individuals with disabilities when seeking rehabilitation services (Strauser et al., 2019).

Functional Impairment: Functional status was measured using the Arabic version of the 12-item short-form of the WHO Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 (WHODAS 2.0). This validated instrument assesses functioning across six domains: cognition, mobility, self-care, interpersonal relationships, life activities, and social participation. In the current study, the instrument demonstrated strong internal consistency, with a Cronbach’s alpha coefficient of 0.87, indicating high reliability among the study participants.</dc:description>
    <dc:subject>Nursing</dc:subject>
    <dc:subject>Community Rehabilitation</dc:subject>
    <dc:type>Dataset</dc:type>
    <dc:identifier>doi:10.17632/hw7nxs6fw8.1</dc:identifier>
    <dc:identifier>oai:data.mendeley.com/hw7nxs6fw8.1</dc:identifier>
    <dc:rights>Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International</dc:rights>
    <dc:rights>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0</dc:rights>
    <dc:relation>https://data.mendeley.com/datasets/hw7nxs6fw8</dc:relation>
    <dc:date>2026-06-03T19:20:53Z</dc:date>
</oai_dc:dc></metadata>
        </record>
    </GetRecord>
</OAI-PMH>
