2026-10-15T09:44:31Z https://data.mendeley.com/oai

oai:data.mendeley.com/pp8zdryks2.2 2026-09-29T12:49:00Z

NARANJO CORDERO, JOSUE ALEJANDRO De-identified Evaluation Data and Analytical Materials for Structured Information Security Policy Review Mendeley Data This dataset accompanies the manuscript “Structured Deliberation for Information Security Policy Review: Design and Initial Evaluation.” It contains de-identified data and analytical materials from two evaluations of the proposed information security policy-review workflow: (1) ratings provided by nine information security and IT governance professionals across 21 five-point Likert items, and (2) ratings provided by nine organizational workshop participants across seven five-point Likert items. The workbook also includes the research instruments, the de-identified deliberation guide, a participant-by-theme binary matrix, recurrence counts for 28 qualitative themes, a thematic codebook, ten analytical categories mapped to six framework functions, and formula-linked calculations for descriptive statistics, Cronbach’s alpha, item-level agreement proportions, and the mean item agreement proportion for the expert appraisal. The deliberation guide and research instruments were originally administered in Spanish; English translations are included for accessibility. No direct personal identifiers are included. Timestamps, exact organizational roles, respondent-linked sectors, raw qualitative narratives, free-text responses, and any crosswalk linking pseudonymous participant codes to identities are withheld because the small samples and role-specific organizational context could enable deductive identification. Aggregate organizational-role groups and expert-sector distributions are retained. The dataset supports recalculation of the reported quantitative summaries and thematic recurrence counts and permits inspection of the de-identified qualitative coding structure. The participant-by-theme matrix uses arbitrary participant codes that are not linked to identities or post-workshop survey codes. There are no missing values in the expert or post-workshop Likert datasets. Version 2 updates terminology and documentation to align the deposited materials with the revised manuscript. Item-level proportions of ratings of 4 or 5 are described as agreement proportions rather than content-validity indices, and the former S-CVI/Ave terminology is replaced by mean item agreement proportion. No participant responses, qualitative coding values, recurrence counts, reliability estimates, descriptive statistics, or other empirical results were changed. Governance Decision Making Risk Assessment Computer Security Policy Dataset doi:10.17632/pp8zdryks2.2 oai:data.mendeley.com/pp8zdryks2.2 Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 https://data.mendeley.com/datasets/pp8zdryks2 2026-09-29T12:49:00Z