<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="/oai-pmh-repository/static/oai2.xsl"?>
<OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd">
    <responseDate>2026-10-15T22:45:03Z</responseDate>
    <request verb="GetRecord" identifier="oai:data.mendeley.com/t5gy72smjh.3" metadataPrefix="oai_dc">https://data.mendeley.com/oai</request>
    <GetRecord>
        <record>
            <header>
                <identifier>oai:data.mendeley.com/t5gy72smjh.3</identifier>
                <datestamp>2026-10-02T11:48:06Z</datestamp>
            </header>
            <metadata><oai_dc:dc xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">
    <dc:creator>Ding, Minqian</dc:creator>
    <dc:title>Supplementary data for LUCC simulation and landscape ecological risk assessment in the Tarim River Basin</dc:title>
    <dc:publisher>Mendeley Data</dc:publisher>
    <dc:description>Table S1. Sensitivity analysis of the landscape ecological risk index (LERI). The disturbance-index weights and land-type fragility scores were perturbed within reasonable ranges across all 115,941 assessment units to test the robustness of the ecological risk results; baseline Jenks natural-breaks thresholds were held fixed for all perturbation scenarios. Under moderate parameter adjustments, the basin-mean ERI and the high-risk cell count fluctuated by less than 1 %, with Spearman spatial correlations above 0.997 (p &lt; 0.001). Scaling the fragility scores altered absolute risk values but not the spatial risk pattern (ρ = 1.000), indicating that the relative spatial risk structure is robust and that the influence of subjective parameter assignment is limited.
Table S2. Confusion matrix and class-specific accuracy of the intPLUS land use simulation for 2020. The matrix cross-references the observed 2020 land-use grids (the calibration target) against simulated outputs for six land categories, reporting producer&apos;s accuracy (PA), user&apos;s accuracy (UA), overall accuracy (OA = 0.972), Kappa coefficient (0.941), and figure of merit (FOM = 0.184). Because the 2020 observation was used in model calibration, these metrics characterize post-calibration reproduction rather than independent validation. PA values exceed 95 % for grassland, forest, and unused land, whereas water bodies and developed land show lower accuracy, mainly due to frequent misclassification between narrow river channels and surrounding unused desert land — a typical feature of arid inland basins. These metrics support the use of the simulated land-use patterns for subsequent multiscenario analysis.</dc:description>
    <dc:subject>Geography</dc:subject>
    <dc:subject>Land Use Change</dc:subject>
    <dc:type>Dataset</dc:type>
    <dc:identifier>doi:10.17632/t5gy72smjh.3</dc:identifier>
    <dc:identifier>oai:data.mendeley.com/t5gy72smjh.3</dc:identifier>
    <dc:rights>Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International</dc:rights>
    <dc:rights>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0</dc:rights>
    <dc:relation>https://data.mendeley.com/datasets/t5gy72smjh</dc:relation>
    <dc:date>2026-10-02T11:48:06Z</dc:date>
</oai_dc:dc></metadata>
        </record>
    </GetRecord>
</OAI-PMH>
