<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="/oai-pmh-repository/static/oai2.xsl"?>
<OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd">
    <responseDate>2026-10-15T09:47:17Z</responseDate>
    <request verb="GetRecord" identifier="oai:data.mendeley.com/wvmkzy7ys4.1" metadataPrefix="oai_dc">https://data.mendeley.com/oai</request>
    <GetRecord>
        <record>
            <header>
                <identifier>oai:data.mendeley.com/wvmkzy7ys4.1</identifier>
                <datestamp>2026-04-30T06:36:55Z</datestamp>
            </header>
            <metadata><oai_dc:dc xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">
    <dc:creator>Al Chami, Riad</dc:creator>
    <dc:title>Algorithmic Power, Visibility-Based Credibility, and Audience Engagement with Cause-Related Content: An Audience-Side Test of Platform-Mediated Communication</dc:title>
    <dc:publisher>Mendeley Data</dc:publisher>
    <dc:description>Platform algorithms increasingly determine which messages reach audiences on social media, yet most communication research on cause-related content has examined source-side characteristics rather than how audiences interpret the platform itself. This study tests whether perceived algorithmic power shapes engagement with cause-related content directly, and whether that relationship is partially mediated by a visibility-based credibility heuristic — the inference that messages a platform makes prominent are messages worth attending to. Survey data were collected from 580 social media users across five English-speaking markets. Confirmatory factor analysis supported a clean three-factor measurement model with strong reliabilities (α = .77–.83) and clear discriminant validity (HTMT &lt; .42); Harman&apos;s single-factor test indicated common-method variance was unlikely a major concern. Regression analyses with controls supported all four hypotheses: perceived algorithmic power predicted both engagement (β = .34, p &lt; .001) and visibility-based credibility (β = .30, p &lt; .001), and visibility-based credibility independently predicted engagement (β = .20, p &lt; .001). A bias-corrected and accelerated bootstrap mediation analysis (5,000 resamples) produced a significant indirect effect (ab = .061, 95% BCa CI [.035, .092]), indicating partial mediation accounting for approximately 18% of the total effect. Findings suggest that audiences treat platform-curated visibility as a relevance cue, with implications for how applied communicators design cause-related campaigns under algorithmic conditions.</dc:description>
    <dc:subject>Communication</dc:subject>
    <dc:subject>Algorithms</dc:subject>
    <dc:type>Dataset</dc:type>
    <dc:identifier>doi:10.17632/wvmkzy7ys4.1</dc:identifier>
    <dc:identifier>oai:data.mendeley.com/wvmkzy7ys4.1</dc:identifier>
    <dc:rights>Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International</dc:rights>
    <dc:rights>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0</dc:rights>
    <dc:relation>https://data.mendeley.com/datasets/wvmkzy7ys4</dc:relation>
    <dc:date>2026-04-30T06:36:55Z</dc:date>
</oai_dc:dc></metadata>
        </record>
    </GetRecord>
</OAI-PMH>
