<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="/oai-pmh-repository/static/oai2.xsl"?>
<OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd">
    <responseDate>2026-10-15T17:14:16Z</responseDate>
    <request verb="GetRecord" identifier="oai:data.mendeley.com/yk5k7ywc3m.1" metadataPrefix="oai_dc">https://data.mendeley.com/oai</request>
    <GetRecord>
        <record>
            <header>
                <identifier>oai:data.mendeley.com/yk5k7ywc3m.1</identifier>
                <datestamp>2026-09-17T12:18:58Z</datestamp>
            </header>
            <metadata><oai_dc:dc xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">
    <dc:creator>Sabaa, Stephen</dc:creator>
    <dc:title>Raw experimental dataset for a comparative evaluation of three commercial wood moisture sensor systems on Norway spruce timber under controlled climate chamber conditions</dc:title>
    <dc:publisher>Mendeley Data</dc:publisher>
    <dc:description>This dataset contains raw measurement data from a comparative experimental evaluation of three commercial resistance-based wood moisture sensor systems (identified as S, T and W) installed in a Norway spruce (Picea abies) structural timber specimen and exposed to five controlled climate conditions (10–30 °C, 40–80% RH) in a climate chamber over a 22-day test period.
The data show that all three systems captured the expected distinction between fast near-surface and slower core moisture response, and that composite sensor moisture readings mostly stayed within a ±3 percentage-point practical accuracy threshold against oven-dry references, with the largest deviations under the coldest test conditions. Temperature agreement with the chamber reference was consistent across systems; relative humidity and moisture content agreement varied by system and by climate condition. The systems also differed substantially in data retrieval method, export format, and metadata completeness – from manual spreadsheet exports to automated API/HTTP-based JSON streams with varying levels of embedded contextual metadata.
This repository contains the raw data behind those results: per-system sensor exports (moisture content, temperature, relative humidity), gravimetric oven-dry reference weighings, and climate-chamber reference logs, provided as retrieved from each source without post-processing or cross-system harmonisation. File- and column-level definitions, units, and which channels were used in the published analysis are documented in the accompanying README.</dc:description>
    <dc:subject>Sensor</dc:subject>
    <dc:subject>Structural Health Monitoring</dc:subject>
    <dc:subject>Timber</dc:subject>
    <dc:type>Dataset</dc:type>
    <dc:identifier>doi:10.17632/yk5k7ywc3m.1</dc:identifier>
    <dc:identifier>oai:data.mendeley.com/yk5k7ywc3m.1</dc:identifier>
    <dc:rights>Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International</dc:rights>
    <dc:rights>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0</dc:rights>
    <dc:relation>https://data.mendeley.com/datasets/yk5k7ywc3m</dc:relation>
    <dc:date>2026-09-17T12:18:58Z</dc:date>
</oai_dc:dc></metadata>
        </record>
    </GetRecord>
</OAI-PMH>
