The evolutions of reduced density matrix elements ρ12 (below) and ρ11 (up) in SB and SIB models in low-frequency bath. The parameters are the same as in Fig. 1.
... The spectral density functions Johm(ω) (b) and Jeff(ω) (a) versus the frequency ω of the bath modes, where Δ=5×109Hz,λκ=1,ξ=0.01,Ω0=10Δ,T=0.01K,Γ=2.6×1011Hz.
... The evolutions of reduced density matrix elements of ρ12 (below) and ρ11 (up) in SIB model in medium-frequency bath in different values of Ω0, the other parameters are the same as in Fig. 1.
... The response functions of the Ohmic bath in (a) low and (c) medium frequencies and effective bath in (b) low and (d) medium frequencies. The parameters are the same as in Fig. 1. The cut-off frequencies for the two cases are taken according to Fig. 2.
... The sketch map on the low-, medium-, and high-frequency baths.
The response functions of the Ohmic bath and effective bath, where Δ=5×109Hz, λκ=1050, ξ=0.01, Ω0=10Δ, T=0.01K, Γ=2.6×1011, the lower-frequency and high-frequency cut-off of the baths modes ω0=11Δ, and ωc=100Δ.
Contributors:Martijn Wubs, Peter Hänggi, Sigmund Kohler
(Color online) Upper panel: adiabatic energies during a LZ sweep of a qubit coupled to two oscillators. Parameters: γ=0.25ℏv and Ω2=100ℏv, both as in Fig. 4; ℏΩ1=80ℏv. Lower panel: probability P↑→↑(t) that the system stays in the initial state |↑00〉 (solid), and corresponding exact survival final survival probability P↑→↑(∞) of Eq. (20) (dotted).
... (Color online) LZ dynamics of a qubit coupled to one oscillator, far outside the RWA regime: γ=ℏΩ=0.25ℏv. The red solid curve is the survival probability P↑→↑(t) when starting in the initial state |↑0〉. The dotted black line is the exact survival probability P↑→↑(∞) based on Eq. (16). The dashed purple curve depicts the average photon number in the oscillator if the qubit would be measured in state |↓〉; the dash-dotted blue curve at the bottom shows the analogous average photon number in case the qubit would be measured |↑〉.
... (Color online) Upper panel: adiabatic energies during a LZ sweep of a qubit coupled to two oscillators with large energies, and with detunings of the order of the qubit–oscillator coupling γ. Parameters: γ=0.25ℏv and ℏΩ2=100ℏv, as before; ℏΩ1=96ℏv. Lower panel: probability P↑→↑(t) that the system stays in the initial state |↑00〉 (solid), and corresponding exact survival final survival probability P↑→↑(∞) of Eq. (20) (dotted).
... (Color online) Upper panel: adiabatic energies during a LZ sweep of a qubit coupled to two oscillators. Parameters: γ=0.25ℏv, ℏΩ1=90ℏv, and Ω2=100ℏv. Viewed on this scale of oscillator energies, the differences between exact and avoided level crossings are invisible. Lower panel: for the same parameters, probability P↑→↑(t) that the system stays in the initial state |↑00〉 (solid), and corresponding exact survival final survival probability P↑→↑(∞) of Eq. (20) (dotted).
... (Color online) Sketch of adiabatic eigenstates during LZ sweep of a qubit that is coupled to one oscillator. Starting in the ground state |↑0〉 and by choosing a slow LZ sweep, a single photon can be created in the oscillator. Due to cavity decay, the one-photon state will decay to a zero-photon state. Then the reverse LZ sweep creates another single photon that eventually decays to the initial state |↑0〉. This is a cycle to create single photons that can be repeated.
A contour plot indicating location of two-dimensional potential energy minima forming a symmetric double well potential when the cantilever equilibrium angle θ0=cos−1[Φo/2BxA], ωi=2π×12000 rad/s, Bx=5×10−2 T. The contour interval in units of frequency (E/h) is ∼4×1011 Hz.
... A superconducting-loop-oscillator with its axis of rotation along the z-axis consists of a closed superconducting loop without a Josephson Junction. The superconducting loop can be of any arbitrary shape.
... A contour plot indicating location of a two-dimensional global potential energy minimum at (nΦ0=0, θn+=π/2) and the local minima when the cantilever equilibrium angle θ0=π/2, ωi=2π×12000 rad/s, Bx=5.0×10−2 T. The contour interval in units of frequency (E/h) is ∼3.9×1011 Hz.
... The potential energy profile of the superconducting-loop-oscillator when the intrinsic frequency is 10 kHz. (a) For external magnetic field Bx=0, a single well harmonic potential near the minimum is formed. (b) Bx=0.035 T. (c) For Bx=0.045 T, a double well potential is formed.
... A schematic of the flux-qubit-cantilever. A part of the flux-qubit (larger loop) is projected from the substrate to form a cantilever. The external magnetic field Bx controls the coupling between the flux-qubit and the cantilever. An additional magnetic flux threading through a dc-SQUID (smaller loop) which consists of two Josephson junctions adjusts the tunneling amplitude. The dc-SQUID can be shielded from the effect of Bx.
Solid lines: synchronization degree D (and in-phase current quadrature 〈X〉) as functions of F for several values of the detection efficiency ηeff. Dashed and dotted lines illustrate the effects of the energy mismatch (ε≠0) and the frequency mismatch (Ω≠Ω0).
Contributors:Y. Nakamura, O. Astafiev, Yu.A. Pashkin, D.V. Averin, T. Yamamoto et al
Probe current oscillations in the first (a) and the second (b) qubit when the system is driven non-adiabatically to the double-degeneracy point X for the case EJ1=9.1GHz and EJ2=13.4GHz. Right panels show the corresponding spectra obtained by Fourier transformation. Arrows and dotted lines indicate theoretically expected position of the peaks.
... EJ1 dependence of the spectrum components of Fig. 6. Solid lines: dependence of Ω+ε and Ω−ε obtained from Eq. (6) using EJ2=9.1GHz and Em=14.5GHz and varying EJ1 from zero to its maximum value of 13.4GHz. Dashed lines: dependence of the oscillationfrequencies of both qubits in the case of zero coupling (Em=0).
... Schematic diagram of the two-coupled-qubit circuit. Black bars denote Cooper pair boxes.
... Probe current oscillations in the first (a) and the second (b) qubit when the system is driven non-adiabatically to the points R and L, respectively. Right panels show the corresponding spectra obtained by the Fourier transform. Peak position in the spectrum gives the value of the Josephson energy of each qubit, indicated by arrow. In both cases, the experimental data (open triangles and open dots) can be fitted to a cosine dependence (solid lines) with an exponential decay with 2.5ns time constant.
... Solid-state qubits
Contributors:Suqing Duan, Bingxin Chu, Xian-Geng Zhao, Weidong Chu, Yan Xie et al
Time evolution of the reduced probability inversion P˜′1(2)−P˜1(2) in the coupling region for ΩR=Tc (a), ΩR>Tc (b), and ΩRoscillation with the same ΩR in each case is shown in gray line.
... Dependence of instantaneous tunneling currents on Rabi frequency ΩR and tunneling rate Tc at t=tp (a), t=1.25tp (b), t=1.5tp (c), and t=2tp (d).
... Rabi oscillation... (a) Schematic representation of a four-dot structure with an electron in Rabi oscillation and another one in quantum tunneling. (b) Time-average current spectrum as functions of ℏω and ε3 for Tc=ΩR=0.4GHz. (c) Schematic diagrams of FLIP operation.
Contributors:R.J. Prance, M.J. Everitt, J.F. Ralph, T.D. Clark, P. Stiffell et al
Power spectral density for the low frequencyoscillator at the resonance point (Φdc=0.00015Φ0) for the three spontaneous decay rates shown in Fig. 2: γ=0.005,0.05,0.5 per cycle. The other parameters are given in the text.
... (a) Close-up of the time-averaged (Floquet) energies of the single photon resonance (500 MHz), solid lines, with the time-independent energies given dotted lines. (b) The output power of the low frequencyoscillator at 300 MHz, as a function of the static magnetic flux bias: γ=0.005 per cycle (solid line), γ=0.05 per cycle (crosses), γ=0.5 per cycle (circles). The other parameters are given in the text.
... Schematic diagram of persistent current qubit  inductively coupled to a (low frequency) classical oscillator. The insert graph shows the time-averaged (Floquet) energies as a function of the external bias field Φx1 for the parameters given in the text.
... Persistent current qubit
Several quantum-mechanical correlations, notably, quantum entanglement, measurement-induced nonlocality and Bell nonlocality are studied for a two qubit-system having no mutual interaction. Analytical expressions for the measures of these quantum-mechanical correlations of different bipartite partitions of the system are obtained, for initially two entangled qubits and the two photons are in their vacuum states. It is found that the qubits-fields interaction leads to the loss and gain of the initial quantum correlations. The lost initial quantum correlations transfer from the qubits to the cavity fields. It is found that the maximal violation of Bell’s inequality is occurring when the quantum correlations of both the logarithmic negativity and measurement-induced nonlocality reach particular values. The maximal violation of Bell’s inequality occurs only for certain bipartite partitions of the system. The frequency detuning leads to quick oscillations of the quantum correlations and inhibits their transfer from the qubits to the cavity modes. It is also found that the dynamical behavior of the quantum correlation clearly depends on the qubit distribution angle.