Données de la recherche du Pôle Information Scientifique et Technique

In order to evaluate negative citations in articles and comments on PubPeer as mechanisms for correcting science, we have built up a corpus of articles associated with retraction or correction notices. As we are interested in citations, we focus here on articles with at least 1 citation according to Scite database, that is 45,811 articles.

Scopus coverage updates (2011-2018) Data aggregated from Elsevier title list files; it provides: - source ID in Scopus - Title - ISSN - ESSN - Year of the title list file used as source - SNIP - Open access status - Status in the database (Added, previously indexed) - Filed - Subfield - ASJC code

L'enquête a été menée auprès de chercheurs via l'envoi à des listes de diffusion et via des appels à participation sur Twitter entre le 24/08/2016 et le 27/09/2016. En langue française.

This dataset has been used for experiments presented in the following paper Ermakova L, Bordignon F, Turenne N, Noel M (to be published in 2018) "Is the abstract a mere teaser? Evaluating generosity of article abstracts in environmental sciences" Frontiers in Research Metrics and Analytics. Those data result from the GEM score calculation for 36,237 abstract/article pairs retrieved from the ISTEX database. They have been enriched with values coming from Scopus (citations), JournalMetrics (subject areas) and oaDOI (Open access status). GEM Score = Generosity Measure