Performance of 11C-FMZ versus 18F-FDG in PET

Published: 11 Oct 2019 | Version 2 | DOI: 10.17632/28jgtynrb4.2
Contributor(s):

Description of this data

File name: 18F-database
Description: 18F-FDG-PET outcomes in the articles included in this meta-analysis: absolute numbers of true positive, false positive, true negative and false negative.

File name: 11C-database
Description: 11C-FMZ-PET outcomes in the articles included in this meta-analysis: absolute numbers of true positive, false positive, true negative and false negative.

File name: roc
Description: Outcomes of 18F-FDG-PET, 11C-FMZ-PET and gold standard in localization of epileptogenic areas, “1” stands for positive, and “0” stands for negative.

Experiment data files

Latest version

  • Version 2

    2019-10-11

    Published: 2019-10-11

    DOI: 10.17632/28jgtynrb4.2

    Cite this dataset

    October, Dataset (2019), “Performance of 11C-FMZ versus 18F-FDG in PET”, Mendeley Data, v2 http://dx.doi.org/10.17632/28jgtynrb4.2

Statistics

Views: 99
Downloads: 23

Previous versions

Compare to version

Categories

Positron Emission Tomography

Licence

CC BY NC 3.0 Learn more

The files associated with this dataset are licensed under a Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 Unported licence.

What does this mean?
You are free to adapt, copy or redistribute the material, providing you attribute appropriately and do not use the material for commercial purposes.

Report