Anonymous vs. Conference Peer Feedback for EAL Writing

Published: 12 June 2019| Version 2 | DOI: 10.17632/3zf5zjhgy3.2
Contributor:
Rafael Zaccaron

Description

Based on the interaction theory (Gass; Mackey, 2006; Long, 1996; Polio, 2012), it was hypothesised that the conference peer feedback group outperforming the anonymous peer feedback group in EAL writing. However, descriptive data showed a slight trend favouring the anonymous group, with no statistically significant difference between the two groups. The ANTCONC files allowed the mapping of the most frequent words, collocations and combination of words present in the answers to the open-ended questions in the questionnaires.

Files

Institutions

Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina

Categories

English as a Second Language, Writing in English, English as a Foreign Language, Writing Process, Writing, Writing Tool

Licence