Data for: Test of the Validity of Bragg´s Rule for Mean Excitation Energies

Published: 27 Feb 2019 | Version 1 | DOI: 10.17632/5b58jx5cvy.1
Contributor(s):

Description of this data

We are investigated the effect of chemical binding on the validity of Bragg’s rule for the calculation of stopping cross sections and mean excitation energies. As test cases we use a series of small molecules and molecular ions, primarily carbon and nitrogen halides. We find that neglect of chemical binding nearly always reduces the mean excitation energies and that the fully atomic decomposition of any molecule but a diatomic molecule never gives the best fulfilment of Bragg’s rule. The best fulfilment of Bragg’s rule is obtained when as few bonds as possible are broken and when the choice of fragments is guided by chemical knowledge. By investigating several alternative fragmentation patterns for a molecule, guidelines for choice of optimal fragmentation are suggested.

Experiment data files

This data is associated with the following publication:

Test of the validity of Bragg’s rule for mean excitation energies of small molecules and ions

Published in: Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section B: Beam Interactions with Materials and Atoms

Latest version

  • Version 1

    2019-02-27

    Published: 2019-02-27

    DOI: 10.17632/5b58jx5cvy.1

    Cite this dataset

    Oddershede, Jens (2019), “Data for: Test of the Validity of Bragg´s Rule for Mean Excitation Energies”, Mendeley Data, v1 http://dx.doi.org/10.17632/5b58jx5cvy.1

Statistics

Views: 26
Downloads: 6

Categories

Accelerator Physics

Licence

CC BY 4.0 Learn more

The files associated with this dataset are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International licence.

What does this mean?

This dataset is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International licence. What does this mean? You can share, copy and modify this dataset so long as you give appropriate credit, provide a link to the CC BY license, and indicate if changes were made, but you may not do so in a way that suggests the rights holder has endorsed you or your use of the dataset. Note that further permission may be required for any content within the dataset that is identified as belonging to a third party.

Report