Data for: Understanding conflicting views of endocrine disruptor experts - a pilot study using argumentation analysis
Published: 1 October 2018| Version 1 | DOI: 10.17632/663kdbpz76.1
Contributors:
Sander Clahsen,
Holly van Klaveren,
Theo Vermeire,
Irene van Kamp,
Bart Garssen,
Aldert Piersma,
Erik Lebret
Description
This dataset provides the raw data to our (forthcoming) publication, meaning the two detailed argumentation structures of the scientific papers subjected to argumentation analysis using pragma-dialectical argumentation theory.
Files
Categories
Industrial Chemicals Toxicology, Environmental Health Risk Assessment, Argumentation Theory, Endocrine System