Data for: Understanding conflicting views of endocrine disruptor experts - a pilot study using argumentation analysis

Name: Data for: Understanding conflicting views of endocrine disruptor experts - a pilot study using argumentation analysis
Creator: Sander Clahsen
Published: 2018-10-01T16:03:00.460Z
Keywords: Industrial Chemicals Toxicology, Environmental Health Risk Assessment, Argumentation Theory, Endocrine System

Clahsen, Sander; van Klaveren, Holly; Vermeire, Theo; van Kamp, Irene; Garssen, Bart; Piersma, Aldert; Lebret, Erik

doi:10.17632/663kdbpz76.1

Data for: Understanding conflicting views of endocrine disruptor experts - a pilot study using argumentation analysis

Published: 1 October 2018| Version 1 | DOI: 10.17632/663kdbpz76.1

Contributors:

Sander Clahsen,

Holly van Klaveren,

Theo Vermeire,

Irene van Kamp,

Bart Garssen,

Aldert Piersma,

Erik Lebret

Description

This dataset provides the raw data to our (forthcoming) publication, meaning the two detailed argumentation structures of the scientific papers subjected to argumentation analysis using pragma-dialectical argumentation theory.

Data for: Understanding conflicting views of endocrine disruptor experts - a pilot study using argumentation analysis

Description

Files