Psychological Distress and Coping Strategies among Infertile Couples in Takoradi, Ghana
Description
### Study Description: The study titled **“Put the child down you’ve married for three years, go have your own”: Psychological Distress and Coping Strategies among Infertile Couples in Takoradi, Ghana** examines the psychosocial implications of infertility within the sociocultural context of Ghana. This research seeks to explore the multifaceted experiences of psychological distress among infertile couples, delving into the societal, relational, and individual factors contributing to their emotional well-being. Employing a qualitative methodology, the study captures the nuanced lived experiences of infertile couples residing in Takoradi. It investigates the manifestations of psychological distress, including anxiety, depression, social alienation, and identity struggles, which arise from cultural stigmatization, societal expectations, and interpersonal pressures. Additionally, the research critically examines the coping strategies employed by these couples, analyzing mechanisms such as medical interventions, religious and spiritual practices, social support systems, and adaptive resilience. Particular attention is given to how cultural norms, gender roles, and community dynamics shape the selection and efficacy of these strategies. The findings of this study aim to contribute to the broader academic discourse on infertility and its psychosocial ramifications, providing evidence-based insights for healthcare practitioners, counselors, and policymakers. These insights will inform the development of culturally appropriate interventions and support systems to mitigate the psychological burden of infertility and enhance the well-being of affected couples in Ghana.
Files
Steps to reproduce
To reproduce the data for the study titled “Put the child down you’ve married for three years, go have your own”: Psychological Distress and Coping Strategies among Infertile Couples in Takoradi, Ghana, several critical methodological steps were undertaken to ensure rigor and credibility. The study employed a qualitative research design within a phenomenological framework to explore the lived experiences of infertile couples. Research questions were developed to investigate psychological distress, societal pressures, and coping mechanisms, ensuring alignment with the study's objectives. Ethical approval was sought from an institutional review board, and informed consent was obtained from all participants. Confidentiality and voluntary participation were emphasized throughout the process to safeguard the rights and privacy of the respondents. Participants were recruited purposively from Takoradi, using diverse entry points such as fertility clinics, hospitals, community networks, and support groups to ensure a broad representation. Semi-structured in-depth interviews served as the primary method of data collection, enabling participants to narrate their experiences comprehensively. Open-ended questions were designed to elicit detailed responses, focusing on psychological distress, cultural stigmatization, and coping strategies. Interviews were supplemented with participant observation and field notes to capture contextual nuances and enhance the richness of the data. Data recording involved the use of audio devices, with explicit consent obtained from participants. Verbatim transcription of the audio recordings ensured the accurate representation of narratives. Interpretative phenomenology analysis (IPA) was employed to guide the process of qualitative data analysis to identify and categorize key themes and patterns within the data. The credibility and reliability of the findings were enhanced through peer debriefing and member checking, which ensured that interpretations aligned with participants’ perspectives. Cultural and contextual considerations were integral to the data collection and analysis processes. The sociocultural realities and gender dynamics of the Takoradi community were carefully considered to ensure the findings authentically represented local contexts. All research protocols, instruments, and coding schemes were meticulously documented. Anonymized data were securely archived for potential secondary analysis while adhering to strict ethical guidelines. These methodological steps provide a replicable framework for future studies examining similar phenomena within comparable sociocultural settings.