Results of the 3D postioning user study

Published: 13 Sep 2019 | Version 6 | DOI: 10.17632/8mdy856frh.6
Contributor(s):

Description of this data

The higher complexity levels of the positioning task require much more time and produce many more errors irrespective of the input method applied.

ANOVA found that the positioning task was performed significantly faster with the 3D glove (M=139.1 s, SD=12) than with the 2D glove (M=198.4 s, SD=21.5), F1, 29=11.4, p=0.002. As can be seen in Fig. 9-left, the decrease in the task completion time was much higher for Levels 2 and 3 than for Level 1. The discovered significant differences between 2D and 3D input were 88.3 s (p=0.001) for the most complex trial (Level 3) and 71.8 s (p<0.001) for the slightly less complex trial (Level 2).

(this is version 6 to test RDM implementations)

Experiment data files

Related links

Latest version

  • Version 6

    2019-09-13

    Published: 2019-09-13

    DOI: 10.17632/8mdy856frh.6

    Cite this dataset

    Zudilova-Seinstra, Elena (2019), “Results of the 3D postioning user study”, Mendeley Data, v6 http://dx.doi.org/10.17632/8mdy856frh.6

Statistics

Views: 46
Downloads: 6

Previous versions

Compare to version

Categories

Human Machine Interaction

Licence

CC BY 4.0 Learn more

The files associated with this dataset are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International licence.

What does this mean?

This dataset is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International licence. What does this mean? You can share, copy and modify this dataset so long as you give appropriate credit, provide a link to the CC BY license, and indicate if changes were made, but you may not do so in a way that suggests the rights holder has endorsed you or your use of the dataset. Note that further permission may be required for any content within the dataset that is identified as belonging to a third party.

Report