Expert evaluation of the content validity of the Self-Perceived Health Scale (SPHS-12)
Description
The objective of conducting this expert evaluation was to assess the degree of relevance among the items to support the proposed conceptual definition, and the degree to which the number of items was sufficient to adequately represent their respective factor. To this end, the experts who agreed to participate were given an e-mail form asking them to evaluate on a scale of 1 (Not at all relevant) to 5 (Fully relevant) each of the items; and on a scale of 1 (Not at all represented) to 5 (Fully represented) the degree to which the items were sufficient to support their respective factors. This was done as we sought to ensure that the final items were sufficiently consistent with the proposed conceptual definition, while achieving adequate conceptual coverage of their factors [50]. This database shows the seven expert contacts' evaluations of the degree of relevance of the items to the conceptual definition of the Self-perceived Health construct (Rows 1-55), and the degree to which the items sufficiently represent their factors (Rows 59-68). For this, the experts evaluated each item on a scale of 1 to 5 using the attached Word form. In column I, the mean score is shown, and in column J the Aiken V is shown. In column K is the number of judges who evaluated each item and in column R are the values of Aiken's V together with their 95% confidence intervals. For detailed information on the analysis procedures performed in columns L, M and N, please refer to https://doi.org/10.20882/adicciones.1213.