An integrated three-way decision methodology for sustainability of wastewater circularity in thermal power plants

Published: 22 November 2023| Version 1 | DOI: 10.17632/chp9xy5ys7.1
Contributors:
Lanndon Ocampo,
,
,

Description

These Microsoft Excel files support our manuscript titled “An integrated three-way decision methodology for sustainability of wastewater circularity in thermal power plants”. 1. We include the file for our dataset of 11 expert decision-makers. This file is necessary for the application of our proposed 3WD-MARCOS method. 2. We include the computations of our Example 1 until Example 4. 3. We also include a file that presents our data for the best-worst method. The results from Lingo® optimization software are shown in this file. We detailed here the computations necessary in obtaining the attribute weights. This file supports Table 5 of our manuscript. 4. We attach here the file for the 3WD-MARCOS application of our case study. This file supports Table 8 and Table 9 of our manuscript. 5. We include the necessary computations of our sensitivity analysis, shown in Section 5 of our manuscript. This file supports Figure 3. 6. Finally, we include a file showing the computations of our comparative analysis (Section 5). This file supports Figure 4, Figure 5, and Table 10 of our manuscript.

Files

Steps to reproduce

These are the steps to reproduce: 1. You need access to our paper titled “An integrated three-way decision methodology for sustainability of wastewater circularity in thermal power plants”. 2. Proceed to Section 2.2. of the manuscript. The computations of Example 1 are shown in a worksheet within the data file “Computations_Examples 1-4.xlsx”. Make sure you keep track of the equations. 3. Proceed to Section 3 of the manuscript. The computations in Example 2 to Example 4 are shown in a worksheet in the “Computations_Examples 1-4.xlsx" data file. Make sure you keep track of the equations. 4. Proceed to Section 2.1. of the manuscript, which details the best-worst method. Following Step 3 of Section 4.2., implement Equation (2) to each respondent in the data file “Computations_Attribute Weights_Best-Worst Method.xlsx”. The aggregation and normalization to obtain the final attribute weights are shown in a worksheet within the file. 5. With the data file “Dataset_Decision Matrices from Expert Decision-Makers.xlsx”, implement Step 4 until Step 9 of Section 4.2. Ensure you keep track of the corresponding equations to follow through the computational steps outlined in the data file “Computations_3WD-MARCOS Application.xlsx”. The ranking of the alternatives (i.e., wastewater reuse applications) can be found in a worksheet within the data file. 6. Proceed to Section 5 to generate insights regarding the sensitivity analysis. Each worksheet in the data file “Computations_Sensitivity Analysis_Section 5.xlsx” corresponds to the combination of weights assigned to the expert and non-expert groups. The summary of the results that generate Figure 3 can be found in a worksheet within the file. 7. Proceed again to Section 5 to generate insights regarding the comparative analysis. With the help of the data file “Dataset_Decision Matrices from Expert Decision-Makers.xlsx”, implement the algorithms of identified methods. Each worksheet corresponds to a specific application of a method. The summary of the results that yield Figure 4, Figure 5, and Table 10 can be found in a worksheet within the file.

Institutions

Cebu Technological University, University of Portsmouth

Categories

Operations Research, Industrial Wastewater, Multiple-Criteria Decision Analysis, Circular Economy, Three-Way Decision

Licence