Freezing displayed by others is a learned cue of danger resulting from co-experiencing own-freezing and shock. Cruz A. et al
Description
Social cues of threat are widely reported [1-3], whether actively produced to trigger responses in others, such as alarm calls, or by-products of an encounter with a predator, like the defensive behaviors themselves, such as escape flights [4-14]. Although the recognition of social alarm cues is often innate [15-17], in some instances it requires experience to trigger defensive responses [4,7]. One mechanism proposed for how learning from self-experience contributes to social behavior is that of auto-conditioning, whereby subjects learn to associate their own behaviors with relevant trigger events. Through this process the same behaviors, now displayed by others, gain meaning. [18,19 but see: 20]. Although it has been shown that only animals with prior experience with shock display observational freezing [21-25] suggesting that auto-conditioning could mediate this process, evidence for this hypothesis was lacking. Previously we found that when a rat freezes, the silence that results from immobility triggers observational freezing in its cage-mate, provided the cage-mate had experienced shocks before [24]. Hence, in our study auto-conditioning would correspond to rats learning to associate shock with their own response to it – freezing. Using a combination of behavioral and optogenetic manipulations, here we show that freezing becomes an alarm cue by a direct association with shock. Our work shows that auto-conditioning can indeed modulate social interactions, expanding the repertoire of cues mediating social information exchange, providing a framework to study how the neural circuits involved in the self-experience of defensive behaviors overlap with the ones involved in socially triggered defensive behaviors. Separate xls files are included for freezing during the social interaction (one file per figure), for freezing during training (figure S 3), freezing during the context test (all figures together) and corticosterone levels (figures S1 and S2). For freezing scores during the social interaction, the behavior of all demonstrators is presented in one table (on the left) and the behavior of all observers is in a second table (on the right). Within each table animals are ordered per dyad, that is the first demonstrator (first column, first table) is the pair of the first observer (first column, second table)..