Data for: Dearomatization of pyrolysis gasoline by extractive distillation with 1-ethyl-3-methylimidazolium tricyanomethanide

Published: 24 July 2019| Version 1 | DOI: 10.17632/cj2cg6g2xd.1
Contributors:
Pablo Navarro, Daniel Moreno, Miguel Ayuso, Marcos Larriba, Julián García, Francisco Rodríguez, Jose Palomar, Ignacio de Dios-García, Noemí Delgado-Mellado

Description

Supplementary material of the manuscript "Dearomatization of pyrolysis gasoline by extractive distillation with 1-ethyl-3-methylimidazolium tricyanomethanide" Tables Table S1 Experimental VLLE or VLE dataa for pyrolysis gasoline model dearomatization using [emim][TCM] with S/F = 5 Table S2 Experimental VLLE or VLE dataa for pyrolysis gasoline model dearomatization using [emim][TCM] with S/F = 10 Table S3 FUGK simulations of the EDC to separate BTX from pyrolysis gasoline by extractive distillation Table S4 Experimental VLE dataa for the BTX/[emim][TCM] separation in the residue stream Table S5. Residue and distillate temperature and composition by FUGK and COSMO-based/Aspen Plus methodologies at 101.3 kPa Table S6. Aromatic purities (Puarom) and recoveries (Rarom) by Navarro et al. algorithm and COSMO-based/Aspen Plus methodologies at 452 K and 5 kPa Table S7. Benzene, toluene and p-xylene solubilities in [emim][TCM] at 363.2 K Table S8. Battery limits for extractive distillation and liquid-liquid extraction processes for S/F = 5 and 15 equilibrium stages for comparison purposes Table S9. Costs for the utilities used from Aspen Economics Figures Figure S1. Extractive distillation process scheme evaluated in the operating cost calculation. Figure S2. Liquid-liquid extraction process scheme evaluated in the operating cost calculation.

Files

Categories

Ionic Liquid, Distillation, Process Simulation

Licence