Gen AI Graphic Design Comments for Analysis

Published: 2 March 2026| Version 1 | DOI: 10.17632/dys5hxct66.1
Contributors:
Raditya Awanda,

Description

Data of anonymous online comments from Indonesia regarding Gen AI in graphic design used for analysis in Qualitative Content Analysis

Files

Steps to reproduce

The search strategy for data retrieval employed a combination of the following keywords in both Indonesian and English. Categories Keywords Generative AI Issues AI art, gambar AI, desain AI, plagiat AI, kecurangan AI, seniman vs AI General Issues hak cipta AI, copyright AI, originalitas gambar, seni mati, kehilangan pekerjaan desain grafis Complaints/Sentiments protes AI, stop AI art, tolak AI, keluhan seniman Popular Tags #NoAI, #AIisTheft, #KaryaAsli, #AntiAI, #StopAIArt To ensure the validity and analytical focus of the study, the following exclusion criteria were applied to the collected dataset: 1. Single-word entries: Comments consisting of only a single word that lack substantive meaning. 2. Media-only content: Responses containing only visual media such as memes, GIFs, or short videos that function solely as reactional gestures without accompanying text. 3. Automated responses: System-generated notifications or automated comments from forum moderator bots. 4. Irrelevant discourse: Content that diverges from the topic of AI-generated imagery or falls outside the domain of the creative arts. 5. Purely inquisitive comments: Entries that consist solely of questions without providing qualitative insights or arguments. 6. Superficial emotional expressions: Comments that express sentiments without further elaboration or substantive discussion. 7. Anecdotal or ironic digressions: Ironic remarks or anecdotes that do not align with the study's central themes.

Institutions

Categories

Artificial Intelligence, Indonesia, Generative Artificial Intelligence

Licence