Data for: A test of the general occurrence and predictive utility of isochronal, equiproportional, ‘variable proportional’, and ‘mixed’ development among arthropods
Description
Supplementary File 2. Contains the datasets extracted for each species from each study (‘Input Data’), an R code (‘EPD tests code’) written by the author to test each dataset for ICD, EPD, and linear and quadratic forms of VPD and produce AICC values, cross-validation errors, and summary output for each of these development models, and the R output of analyses performed with this code on each species’ dataset (‘Output Data’). Supplementary File 3. Contains Tables S3 and S4. Table S3. Summary of performance metrics calculated for each development model [ICD, EPD, VPD (Lin), and VPD (Quad)] for each species’ dataset tested, including model AICC, Δi, rank based on AICC (1-4), cross-validation error, pseudo-R2, and mean raw (in d) and percent (%) absolute prediction errors calculated for each species’ dataset. Whether conditions for concluding ICD or EPD were met by the data is also outlined. Whether original studies reported full development times and if each species had anamorphic or metamorphic development is also listed. The number of developmental stages whose proportions were significantly affected by temperature or not is also listed, as well as the proportion of stages with significant temperature effects, and thus whether or not the species had mixed development. The studies cited in this table are provided with Table S2 in Supplementary File 1. Table S4. The proportions of total development spent by each of the species examined in this study in each of their immature developmental stages, as predicted based on the parameters of development models fit to them using GLMs in the present study. For all equations, the predicted proportions were back-transformed from arcsine-square-roots. Equations are included as Excel formulae, and those for VPD models are linked to values in the first column representing temperature (set to an arbitrary value of 15°C in this file). Whether the developmental proportion of each stage was significantly affected by temperature is also indicated (1 = affected, 0 = not affected) in the columns to the right of each VPD model’s column. Whether each developmental stage was feeding or non-feeding is also listed. The studies cited in this table are provided with Table S2 in Supplementary File 1.