Medical Education Phase 2
Description
Data collected for "Radiation Oncology Resident Evaluations: Current Methods and Resident Perceptions" which highlights resident perception of current evaluation methods in radiation oncology graduate medical education
Files
Steps to reproduce
Likert survey data was collected from 52 respondents. Choice text was converted to numerical values for the purpose of analysis based on the following scale: not familiar= 1, slightly familiar=2, moderately familiar=3, very familiar=4, extremely familiar= 5; not valuable= 1, slightly valuable=2, moderately valuable=3, very valuable=4, extremely valuable= 5; ; extremely unlikely= 1, somewhat unlikely= 2, neither likely nor unlikely= 3, somewhat likely= 4, extremely likely= 5; strongly disagree= 1, somewhat disagree= 2, neither agree nor disagree=3, somewhat agree= 4, strongly agree= 5; extremely dissatisfied=1, somewhat dissatisfied= 2, neither satisfied nor dissatisfied= 3, somewhat satisfied= 4, extremely satisfied=5; not useful=1, slightly useful=2, moderately useful=3, very useful=4, extremely useful= 5 Median and IQR were calculated for each Likert item and reported as descriptive statistics To analyze the relationship between familiarity with evaluation methods and stress/intimidation of receiving evaluations, their utility, or the likelihood of changing post-evaluation, we summed numerical Likert data from respective questions: familiarity with evaluation methods (sum of Likert data Q1_1, Q1_2, Q1_3), the utility of evaluations (sum of Likert data from Q6_1, Q6_2, Q6_3, Q6_4), the likelihood of changing post-evaluation (non-summed Q3), stress of receiving evaluation (non-summed Q4_1) and intimidation of receiving evaluations (non-summed Q4_2). and used Stata linear regression function to complete the analysis.