The Impact of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Combined with Retrieval Practice on Memory Retention in Healthy Older Adults

Description

We hypothesize that older adults' memory performance will be significantly better with anodal tDCS than with sham or no stimulation. Additionally, RP is expected to outperform repeated learning, with anodal tDCS in the RP condition leading to better recall organization than in the relearning group.This study employed a randomized, single-blind, sham-controlled experimental design.A total of 176 older adults were initially recruited by elderly communities in Xixia District, Yinchuan City, Ningxia Province, the final sample included 158 participants (74 males), with an average age of 67.63±7.62 years. All participants had a Mini-Mental State Examination score of 26 or higher. The design was a 3 (stimulation type: anodal stimulation, sham stimulation, no stimulation) × 2 (learning strategy: retrieval practice, repeated learning) between-subjects factorial design. Both stimulation type and learning strategy were between-subject variables. The dependent variables were the correct recall rate, the number of correctly recalled words, and the adjusted ratio of clustering (ARC) scores at different testing stagesThe data were analyzed using SPSS 27.0.1and R. Free recall performance from the initial and final tests was calculated across three stimulation conditions and two learning methods. For the RP)group, the joint probability of free recall performance during the two initial test stages was computed. Additionally, recall organization was measured using the Adjusted Ratio of Clustering (ARC) score , which ranges from -1 to 1. An ARC score of 0 indicates chance-level clustering, while a score of 1 reflects perfect clustering. Negative ARC scores, indicating atypical recall patterns , were excluded from the analysis.ANOVAs and ANCOVAs were used to analyze the number of correctly recalled words, recall accuracy, and ARC scores for the two learning strategies across the three stimulation conditions. All tests were conducted with an alpha level of 0.05. Where interactions were detected, post-hoc t-tests with Bonferroni corrections were applied. Effect sizes were reported as Cohen’s d for t-tests and partial eta-squared for ANOVAs. In cases of non-significant results, Bayesian ANOVAs were performed to assess the evidence strength for the null hypothesis, with Bayesian Factor (BF01) values greater than 3 supporting the null hypothesis, and values below 0.33 supporting the alternative hypothesis . Additionally, mediation analyses were conducted to explore whether recall organization mediated the relationship between learning method or stimulation type and free recall performance in the final test. Relationships among anodal tDCS, PANAS mood changes, and memory retrieval were also examined. Mediation models were tested using the lavaan package in R, with direct and indirect effects estimated via bootstrap methods using 5,000 bootstrap samples to compute coefficients and 95% confidence intervals.

Steps to reproduce

This study investigates whether the combination of retrieval practice (RP) and transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) can effectively improve semantic memory in older adults. We hypothesize that these two methods could enhance each other through different mechanisms, leading to additive benefits in memory function. To achieve accurate results, it's essential to examine the spacing effect in both RP and tDCS interventions. Direct current stimulation device: A battery-powered direct current stimulation device from the Spanish company NE (Starstim) was used for the tDCS intervention. The same electrode montage was applied across all groups, with electrode placement following the 10-20 international EEG system. The tDCS intervention used 8 cm² circular sponges soaked in saline. The anode was placed over the F3 region (i.e., left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, L-DLPFC), and the cathode was placed over the FP2 region (i.e., contralateral supraorbital area). The stimulation current intensity was set at 2 mA, with a duration of 25 minutes (Au, 2022).The tDCS stimulation protocol followed a sham-controlled design. Specifically, under the anodal tDCS condition, stimulation was initiated 5 minutes before the task to allow participants to become familiar with the sensation of stimulation. For the sham (placebo) tDCS group, the procedure was identical to the anodal tDCS condition, except the stimulation was carefully turned off after 20 seconds. The no-stimulation group performed only the behavioral tasks without receiving any stimulation. Study list: A learning list was generated using the Modern Chinese Frequency Dictionary, based on Bordignon's (2015) guidelines. The list includes 44 medium-frequency two-character words, with 5 words chosen from 8 different semantic categories: animals, clothing, communication media, fruits, vegetables, stationery, occupations, and vehicles. An additional 4 buffer words, taken from the categories of musical instruments and furniture (2 words from each), were placed at the beginning and end of the list to mitigate primacy and recency effects. Procedure: The experiment took place over two days, with the initial learning and test/relearning phases on the first day, followed by a final test after a 24-hour delay. The experimental procedure was programmed using PsychoPy software (Peirce, 2019), and participants were tested individually on a computer. Prior to the formal experiment, participants were randomly assigned to one of three learning methods and two stimulation conditions.

Institutions

Categories

Funding

Licence