Mass flows maps at Mount Cleveland from DEMs
Description
These data are the results in a paper entitled "Quantifying mass flows at Mt. Cleveland, Alaska between 2001 and 2020 using satellite photogrammetry" submitted to JVGR in 2022. It includes the 2-m resolution surface elevation change and uncertainty maps for the 2001 Cleveland eruption (Fig. 1a in the paper), the 2-m resolution surface elevation change, and uncertainty maps corresponding to the accumulative changes of the following three eruptions: February 3, 2017, to January 20, 2019 eruption, the November 7 to November 15, 2019 eruption, and the June 1, 2020 eruption (Fig. 3a). This data set also includes the boundary of the deposit field, the boundary of mass loss, and the boundary of snow. Here we also share the digitized outlines from mass flows in previously published material (e.g., Smith (2005) and an image from the Alaska Volcano Observatory). The GeoTIFF files can be viewed in free and open-source software QGIS, in Google Earth, or by Matlab using code https://github.com/ihowat/setsm_postprocessing/blob/master/readGeotiff.m. The shapefiles can be viewed in QGIS. Google Earth may not show some of the shapefiles well. Smith, S.J., 2005. Chronologic multisensor assessment for Mount Cleveland, Alaska from 2000 to 2004 focusing on the 2001 eruption (Doctoral dissertation). Dai, C., Howat, I.M., Freymueller, J.T., Lu, Z., Vijay, S., Liljedahl, A.K., Jones, M.K.W., Bergstedt, H. and Lev, E., 2022. Quantifying mass flows at Mt. Cleveland, Alaska between 2001 and 2020 using satellite photogrammetry. Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal Research, p.107614.
Files
Institutions
Categories
Funding
NASA Earth Surface and Interior Program Grant 80NSSC20K0491
Computational Modelling
Objective of the Model | Show the mass flows maps |
Typical Input | N/A |
Typical output | N/A |
Computer System Requirements | Matlab, qgis |
Simulation ID | N/A |
Patents
Patent Title | N/A |
Patent Application | N/A |
AM Sample Data Template
Sample ID | N/A |
Date | 2021-10-01T00:00:00.000Z |
Alloy Type | Fe-Base |
Alloy composition | N/A |
Alloy certificate | N/A |
Process ID | N/A |
AM Process Data Template
Additive Manufacturing Process | ASTM |
Process Parameters | ASTM |
Process Date | 2021-08-31T00:00:00.000Z |
Process Description | Time series analysis of DEMs. |
CAD File | N/A |
Process ID | N/A |
Research Process Flow
Process Flow for Additive Manufacturing | n/a |
Process Flow for Ex-situ Characterization | n/a |
Process Flow for In-situ Characterization | n/a |
Process Flow for Computational Modeling | n/a |
Software
Available Software | n/a |
Type | Commercial |
Contact link | n/a |
Publications
Sample ID | N/A |
Publication Title | Quantifying mass flows at Mt. Cleveland, Alaska between 2001 and 2020 using satellite photogrammetry |
Citation | n/a |
Authors | Chunli Dai1, Ian M. Howat2, Jeffrey T. Freymueller3, Zhong Lu4, Saurabh Vijay5, Anna K. Liljedahl6, Melissa K. Ward Jones7, Helena Bergstedt7, Einat Lev 8 |
MURI/AUSMURI University
User Name | N/A |
University | Louisiana State University |
Address | LOUISIANA STATE UNIVERSITY Baton Rouge, LA 70803 |
Acknowledgement | This work was supported by NASA Earth Surface and Interior Program Grant 80NSSC20K0491 and also by the U.S. National Science Foundation Office of Polar Programs Grant A005265701 via a subcontract to the University of Minnesota. Geospatial support for this work was provided by the Polar Geospatial Center under NSF‐OPP Awards 1043681 and 1559691. DEMs provided by the Polar Geospatial Center under NSF‐OPP Awards 1043681, 1559691, and 1542736. DigitalGlobe/Maxar data were provided by NASA's Commercial Archive Data for NASA investigators (cad4nasa.gsfc.nasa.gov) under the National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency's NextView license agreement. Some imagery used in this paper was also provided by the United States National Geospatial Intelligence Agency and the Polar Geospatial Center at the University of Minnesota through the NextView licensing program. The 30 m SRTM DEMs are from NASA's Earth Observing System Data and Information System (EOSIDS). Some figures in this paper were generated using the Generic Mapping Tools (GMT) (Wessel and Smith, 1991). We would like to thank Paul Morin (Polar Geospatial Center) for the timely request of satellite tasking shortly after the eruption (in July 2020), which enabled us to obtain several high quality post-event images. |
Hardware
Available Hardware | N/A |
Accessibility | N/A |
Contact link | N/A |
Ex-situ Characterization Data Template
Sample ID | N/A |
Process ID | N/A |
Characterization Type | N/A |
Characterization Instrument | N/A |
Ex-situ Measurement Details | N/A |
In-situ Characterization Data Template
Sample ID | N/A |
Process ID | N/A |
Characterization Type | N/A |
Characterization Instrument | N/A |
In-situ Measurement Details | N/A |