Network Centrality Values of 30 Cases of Biopiracy
Description
This document is published to supplement the document titled “A Social Network Perspective on the 30 Cases Of Biopiracy: Background Information and Sources” previously published on Mendeley Data and the chapter titled “Unveiling the Legal Geography of Biopiracy of Genetic Resources and Traditional Knowledge Using Social Network Analysis” to be published in Legal Geographies of Intellectual Property (editors: Jenny Kanellopoulou and Smita Kheria). The content of this document is the result of the social network analysis conducted by the author on 30 selected cases of biopiracy. It provides social network centrality values for each case, including degree (in-degree and out-degree), closeness, betweenness, and Eigenvector centrality. To arrive at this data, the author has conducted a comprehensive and in-depth review of the existing literature on biopiracy cases based on a systematic online search. The literature includes a wide spectrum of published legal and scientific research, project reports, legal documents related to access and benefit-sharing agreements, newspapers, and patent records. The cases have been carefully scrutinized, drawing from a multitude of sources to minimize the risk of misinformation and altered narratives regarding the flow of genetic resources and the associated traditional knowledge, as well as the position of specific nodes within the network. The resulting set of 30 cases primarily involves instances of misappropriation and patenting of genetic resources, with a smaller number involving traditional knowledge. The use of any content in this document must be accompanied by a proper citation to the open data titled “A Social Network Perspective on the 30 Cases Of Biopiracy: Background Information and Sources” previously published on Mendeley as well as the chapter titled “Unveiling the Legal Geography of Biopiracy of Genetic Resources and Traditional Knowledge Using Social Network Analysis” to be published in Legal Geographies of Intellectual Property (editors: Jenny Kanellopoulou and Smita Kheria).
Files
Steps to reproduce
To arrive at this data, the author has conducted a comprehensive and in-depth review of the existing literature based on a systematic online search. The literature includes a wide spectrum of published legal and scientific research, project reports, legal documents related to access and benefit-sharing agreements, newspapers, and patent records, all of which have been cited in the attached document. The cases have been carefully scrutinized, drawing from a multitude of sources to minimize the risk of misinformation and altered narratives regarding the flow of genetic resources and the associated traditional knowledge, as well as the position of specific nodes within the network. The selection of cases does not adhere to specific time constraints; rather, the boundaries of the dissemination of resources are ultimately defined by the availability of information within published materials. The criteria for selecting the 30 cases of biopiracy include the availability of published information regarding the flow of genetic resources and the associated traditional knowledge, the ability to attribute the genetic resource and the associated traditional knowledge to at least one indigenous or local community representing the origin of the relevant resource, and the presence of actions corresponding to biopiracy by at least one of the nodes. Additionally, the inclusion of cases from diverse continents and regions has been considered during the case selection. The resulting set of 26 cases primarily involves instances of misappropriation and patenting of genetic resources, with a smaller number involving traditional knowledge. Cases with dubious ties between most nodes, as well as putative cases of biopiracy lacking supporting evidence beyond hearsay, have been meticulously excluded from the selection. Finally, to the extent permitted by available data, links representing the biotrade of genetic resources have also been integrated into the social-network-analysis-based narratives of some cases, providing a broader view of their dissemination through various routes.