Data for: Are fieldwork studies being relegated to second place in conservation science?
Description of this data
This dataset has been used for the analysis presented in the paper C.A. Ríos-Saldaña, M. Delibes-Mateos, C. Ferreira, Are fieldwork studies being relegated to second place in conservation science?, Glob. Ecol. Conserv. 14 (2018) e00389.
Those data results from searching, in Thomson Scientific’s Web of Knowledge database, the “Biodiversity and Conservation” subject heading line and restrict the search to results since 1980. Using these search term, we downloaded the publication information, i.e., title, abstract, author, publication year, source, volume, issue, pages, as a tab-delimited text file, suitable for further processing. They have been enriched with values coming from Scholar Google (cites), Journal Citation Reports (Impact factor, quartile), and the own analysis, that consisted of reading and screening each article to determine it was based on fieldwork (i.e. papers that reported new observational and/orfield investigations) or not (for more details see Ríos-Saldaña et al. 2018).
Experiment data files
This data is associated with the following publication:
Cite this dataset
Ríos-Saldaña, C. Antonio; Delibes-Mateos, Miguel; Ferreira, Catarina C. (2018), “Data for: Are fieldwork studies being relegated to second place in conservation science? ”, Mendeley Data, v1 http://dx.doi.org/10.17632/z7b238r8mk.1
The files associated with this dataset are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International licence.