Cortex

Raw data from the paper "Complexity in neuropsychological assessment of cognitive impairment. A network analysis approach" by Tosi, Borsani, Castiglioni, Daini, Franceschi and Romano. The file includes all the raw scores of the neuropsychological assessments.

RT data from masked priming studies (Experiments 1-3). Dat from delayed priming study (Experiment4). Key to experimental parameters.

Preprocessed Reaction Times (RTs) and Movement Times (MTs) for planning functional grasps of tools, and the associated movement response durations. For details, see Main Text.

In this data set, we include the data for two auditory lexical decision experiments which are presented in the paper entitled "Differences between morphological and repetition priming in auditory lexical decision: Implications for decompositional models". Included with the data are the minimally processed raw data files, the R scripts used to prepare, trim, visualize, and model the data (using linear mixed-effects models), the model outputs themselves, and the graphs generated from the data. Please refer to the file_descriptions.pdf file for more details on the data itself. To start examining the data, please refer to the scripts labeled 1_exp1_data_prep.R and 1_exp2_data_prep.R . Following through to the other R scripts in the /scripts/ folder takes the reader through the analyses presented in the paper. These analyses read in CSV files from the /data/input/ folder and process them to create exp1_prep.csv, exp2_prep.csv, exp1_trim.csv, and exp2_trim.csv. These trimmed data sets are then used in the later scripts in the /scripts/ folder to generate the models found in the /scripts/data/ folder (the HTML output of which are in the /scripts/models/ folder) and the graphs found in the /scripts/graphs/ folder. The final scripts entitled exp1_models.R and exp2_models.R generate the models are found in /scripts/data/. Please direct comments about the data-set to the corresponding authors of the associated paper, Robert J. Wilder (rwilder@sas.upenn.edu) and Amy Goodwin Davies (amygood@sas.upenn.edu).

These files are the raw (decimated to sampling rate of 512Hz) EEG recordings. The raw bdf files have been imported into EEG lab and saved as .set and .fdt files. No other processing has been applied. For further information about these data, please contact the first author Dr Elizabeth Milne, E.Milne@sheffield.ac.uk

Raw data and analysis code for Experiments 1-2, and meta-analysis.

Perceptual and tapping data

This dataset contains the data collected for the following paper: Blake, Y., Terburg, D., Balchin, r., van Honk, J., & Solms, M. The Role of the Basolateral Amygdala in Dreaming. Cortex, Under Revision. The data consists of scores for 23 dream reports collected from 8 patients with bilateral basolateral amygdala lesions due to Urbach Wiethe Disease, and 52 dream reports collected from 17 matched healthy controls. These dream reports were scored on seven measures by three independent research assistants. For information on the measures used, please see the descriptions in the paper. Brief description of each variable: PATIENT: Classifies the research participant as either an UWD patient or a control PARTICIPANT: Unique number assigned to each participant DREAM: Unique number assigned to each dream report collected from the participants POS_AFFECT: The dream report’s positive affect score (as measured by the PANDAS) NEG_AFFECT: The dream report’s negative affect score (as measured by the PANDAS) WISH: The dream report’s wish-fulfilment score NIGHTMARE: a score of 1 indicates that the dream report was classified as a nightmare, a score of 0 indicates that it was not. ANGER, LUST, PLAY, SEEKING, CARE, FEAR, LOSS: These variables indicate the dream reports score on each of Panksepp (1998)’s basic emotions, as measured by the ADS APP_AV: a score of 1 indicates that the dream report was classified as predominantly consisting of approach behaviour, a score of 0 indicates that the dream report was classified as predominantly consisting of avoidance behaviour. THREAT: a score of 1 indicates that the dream report was rated as containing a realistic physical threat to the dreamer, a score of 0 indicates that the dream report was not rated as containing a realistic physical threat to the dreamer. LIFE*: If the dream contained a realistic physical threat, was that threat rated as being life threatening? 1 = Yes, 0 = No ANCESTRAL*: If the dream contained a realistic physical threat, was that threat rated as being ancestral or modern? 1 = ANCESTRAL, 0 = MODERN ESCAPE*: If the dream contained a realistic physical threat, does the dreamer escape the threat? 1 = Yes, 0 = No. REALISTIC**: If the dreamer was able to escape the threat in their dream, is this escape realistic? 1 = Yes, 0 = No WORD_COUNT: The number of words counted in the dream report N_ITEM_COUNT: The number of narrative items counted in the dream report FACTOR 1: The dream report’s score on the first component extracted by the PCA FACTOR 2: The dream report’s score on the second component extracted by the PCA FACTOR 1: The dream report’s score on the third component extracted by the PCA *NOTE: The LIFE, ANCESTRAL, ESCAPE variables are only relevant if the score for THREAT = 1 **NOTE: The REALISTIC variable is only relevant if the score for ESCAPE = 1

Study data and labels mapped onto the standard subject (fsaverage, FreeSurfer)

This is the behavioral data from the experiments outlined in our study, "Psychological and neural responses to architectural interiors."