Journal of Experimental Social Psychology

Original data for Studies 1-5 in "Norms, Minds, and Morality: Moral Judgment is about More than Outcomes"

Data for this manuscript.

Data for Stroessner, S.J., Benitez, J., Perez, M.A., Wyman, A.B., Carpinella, C.M., & Johnson, K.L. (Under review). What's In a shape? Evidence of gender category associations with basic forms.

These are mouse tracking data that accompany two experiments reported in a manuscript titled Young, Tracy, Wilson, Rydell, & Hugenberg. The analyses reported in the paper (with Area under the Curve values as the DV) are provided here.

Data from Experiments 1-3. In Experiments 1 and 2, participants with a value of 1 for the Leader variable were the group leaders. In Experiment 3, participants with a value of 1 for the Stats variable were the Higher-Status dyad member. For the Condition variable, 1 = Shared information condition, 2 = Unshared Higher-Status information condition, and 3 = Unshared Lower-Status information condition.

Data of two negotiation experiments. Two factors were manipulated experimentally: The salient motive (whether negotiating parties were driven by personal values or by the utilities) and the provision of information about the counterpart's underlying motive and priorities. The dependent variables are resistance to concession making, integrative trade-offs, joint outcomes (only Study 2), partial impasses (only Study 2), and subjective evaluations of the negotiation.

Documentation of three studies and a pilot are included in these files. Study 1 was correlational (N = 141), study 2 and 3 were experimental (N = 202; 164), and the pilot was correlational (N = 65). The purpose of study 1 was to test whether the difference between national majorities and cultural minorities (asymmetric groups) in support for multiculturalism (based on collective justice) is moderated by beliefs in individual responsibility (a key dimension of individual justice). Measures used for hypothesis testing include: Belief in individual responsibility (IndResp, 4 items; 2 4 reversed), Support for multicultural ideology (CDI_M, 3 items), Support for multicultural policy (CDP_M, 4 items). Additional measures in the dataset include: National identity (IDCH, 4 items), Cultural identity (IDOrig, 4 items), Social dominance orientation (SDO, 6 items; 2 4 6 reversed), Right-wing authoritarianism (RWA, 3 items). Raw data is provided ("Study1_Orig") as well as prepared data on which final analyses were conducted ("Study1_Prep"). The syntax and questionnaire are also provided. Participants were recruited online using a snowball technique. While the online data showed that 286 people accessed the online questionnaire, only 141 began to fill it out. All were residents of Switzerland. The purpose of study 2 was to replicate results of study 1 and to disentangle three key features of these asymmetric groups: High vs. low status, native vs. immigrant, and numerical majority vs. minority. A 2 x 2 x 2 experimental design was used. The same measures used for hypothesis testing in study 1 are included in study 2. Manipulation checks are also included: Perceived privilege (4 items; 2 4 reversed), Recall and understanding of the text (6 items divided into pairs according to conditions), Easiness/Difficulty of the exercise (2 items). Raw data, the prepared data on which analyses were conducted, the syntax, and the eight experimental questionnaires are provided (all entitled "Study 2 [...]"). Students from a Psychology course at a University in French-speaking Switzerland participated. The purpose of study 3 was to replicate results of studies 1 and 2 using alternative measures of individual justice beliefs and a 2 x 2 experimental design (High vs. low status, Native vs. immigrant). Method and documents are otherwise the same as study 2 ("Study 3 [...]"). A new group of students participated. The purpose of the pilot study was to construct and validate the alternative measures in study 3: Prescriptive individual responsibility (IndResp, 4 items) and Classical liberalism (LibComm, 6 items; 2 4 6 reversed). Additional measures include the one from studies 1 and 2, plus human rights support and free market ideology. The data, syntax and questionnaire are provided. Participants were recruited on the university campus. Studies were conducted in French and documentation is original. Comments in the syntax are provided in English.

Materials for two studies on the impact of an “aha” moment on gender biases.

dataset of two experiments with a repeated trust game and an interpersonal distance task

This data set was used to test whether sharing attention on belief affirming content would lead to greater affiliation (i.e., felt closeness).