Journal of Experimental Social Psychology

Data of two negotiation experiments. Two factors were manipulated experimentally: The salient motive (whether negotiating parties were driven by personal values or by the utilities) and the provision of information about the counterpart's underlying motive and priorities. The dependent variables are resistance to concession making, integrative trade-offs, joint outcomes (only Study 2), partial impasses (only Study 2), and subjective evaluations of the negotiation.

I have uploaded the datafiles I used to conduct the analyses reported in Studies 1-5.

dataset of two experiments with a repeated trust game and an interpersonal distance task

The present study had four objectives. First, we aimed at replicating the effects of provocation on reactive aggression in a monetary modified Taylor Aggression Paradigm (mTAP). Moreover, we examined the moderating role of gender expecting higher gender differences under conditions of low provocation and smaller gender differences under conditions of high provocation. In terms of convergent validity, we hypothesized a significant relationship between self-reported trait aggression and behavioral aggression outcomes in the laboratory paradigm. Finally, to explore the role of provocation sequence, the monetary stimuli (0 - 90 cents) were presented either randomly or in a fixed sequence. In contrast to the random sequence, the fixed sequence was generated as triplets of the same provocation category. Because of the more homogeneous provocation sequence in the fixed condition, we expected higher aggression levels after higher provocation and lower aggression levels after lower provocation in this experimental condition. In this experiment, 209 young healthy participants (104 males, 105 females) completed a mock competitive reaction time task with a fictional opponent with 40% preprogrammed win and 60% lose trials. In lose trials, participants were provoked by subtracting a low (0 - 20 euro cents), medium (30 - 60 cents) or high (70 - 90 cents) amount of money from their account.

All raw data and procedures

This research data file includes materials used in the present work.

Data for Stroessner, S.J., Benitez, J., Perez, M.A., Wyman, A.B., Carpinella, C.M., & Johnson, K.L. (Under review). What's In a shape? Evidence of gender category associations with basic forms.

All data from manuscript: "Measure what you are trying to predict: Applying the correspondence principle to the Implicit Association Test"

Data sets from a.) raw data from all participants who completed the study on Project Implicit, b.) data with planned exclusions due to IAT error rates or missing self-report data, c.) data used in SEM analyses with additional exclusions for having any missing data.

Data from Experiments 1-3. In Experiments 1 and 2, participants with a value of 1 for the Leader variable were the group leaders. In Experiment 3, participants with a value of 1 for the Stats variable were the Higher-Status dyad member. For the Condition variable, 1 = Shared information condition, 2 = Unshared Higher-Status information condition, and 3 = Unshared Lower-Status information condition.