Roads versus flows in the Great Western Woodlands: surface-water insights into linear infrastructure effects

Published: 7 Dec 2017 | Version 2 | DOI: 10.17632/b7xpsmwb4s.2
Contributor(s):

Description of this data

These datasets and spatial files are the data underlying the analyses presented in the paper 'Linear infrastructure impacts on landscape hydrology' published in the Journal of Environmental Management in 2018 (Volume 206, pp 446-457).

The extent of roads and other forms of linear infrastructure is burgeoning worldwide, but their impacts are inadequately understood and thus poorly mitigated. Previous studies have identified many potential impacts, including alterations to the hydrological functions and soil processes upon which ecosystems depend. However, these impacts have seldom been quantified at a regional level, particularly in arid and semi-arid systems where the gap in knowledge is the greatest, and impacts potentially the most severe.

To explore the effects of extensive track, road, and rail networks on surface hydrology at a regional level we assessed over 1000 km of linear infrastructure, including approx. 300 locations where ephemeral streams crossed linear infrastructure, in the largely intact landscapes of Australia’s Great Western Woodlands. We found a high level of association between linear infrastructure and altered surface hydrology, with erosion and pooling 5 and 6 times as likely to occur on-road than off-road on average (1.06 erosional and 0.69 pooling features km-1 on vehicle tracks, compared with 0.22 and 0.12 km-1, off-road, respectively). Erosion severity was greater in the presence of tracks, and 98% of crossings of ephemeral streamlines showed some evidence of impact on water movement (flow impedance (62%); diversion of flows (73%); flow concentration (76%); and/or channel initiation (31%)). Infrastructure type, pastoral land use, culvert presence, soil clay content and erodibility, mean annual rainfall, rainfall erosivity, topography and bare soil cover influenced the frequency and severity of these impacts.

We conclude that linear infrastructure frequently affects ephemeral stream flows and intercepts natural overland and near-surface flows, artificially changing site-scale moisture regimes, with some parts of the landscape becoming abnormally wet and other parts becoming water-starved. In addition, linear infrastructure frequently triggers or exacerbates erosion, leading to soil loss and degradation. Where linear infrastructure densities are high, their impacts on ecological processes are likely to be considerable. Linear infrastructure is widespread across much of this relatively intact region, but there remain areas with very low infrastructure densities that need to be protected from further impacts. There is substantial scope for mitigating the impacts of existing and planned infrastructure developments.

Experiment data files

Steps to reproduce

please refer to article methods

Related links

Latest version

  • Version 2

    2017-12-07

    Published: 2017-12-07

    DOI: 10.17632/b7xpsmwb4s.2

    Cite this dataset

    Raiter, Keren (2017), “Roads versus flows in the Great Western Woodlands: surface-water insights into linear infrastructure effects”, Mendeley Data, v2 http://dx.doi.org/10.17632/b7xpsmwb4s.2

Previous versions

Compare to version

Institutions

University of Western Australia Faculty of Science

Categories

Ecology, Erosion, Conservation Planning, Surface Hydrology, Environmental Impact Assessment, Soil Conservation, Applied Hydrology, Conservation Ecology, Infrastructure Development

Mendeley Library

Organise your research assets using Mendeley Library. Add to Mendeley Library

Licence

CC BY 4.0 Learn more

The files associated with this dataset are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International licence.

What does this mean?

This dataset is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International licence. What does this mean? You can share, copy and modify this dataset so long as you give appropriate credit, provide a link to the CC BY license, and indicate if changes were made, but you may not do so in a way that suggests the rights holder has endorsed you or your use of the dataset. Note that further permission may be required for any content within the dataset that is identified as belonging to a third party.

Report