Improving identification of determinants of evidence-based practice implementation - Strategies Survey

Published: 19 June 2024| Version 1 | DOI: 10.17632/dcztd63cft.1
Contributor:
Bryan Weiner

Description

This study leveraged an existing implementation effort in Kaiser Permanente Washington to increase access to cancer genetic services. Using OPTICC Stage I and Stage II methods (see OPTICC.org), this study matched implementation strategies to high priority determinants for routine hereditary cancer risk assessment and delivery of genetic testing, and evaluated a staged, stakeholder-driven approach to program implementation planning. This dataset consists of responses to our strategies survey, based on a 4-point Likert scale (Example: not at all workable, somewhat workable, workable, extremely workable). The purpose of this survey was to gauge participants' thoughts on how workable and effective different implementation strategies would be. Five participants responded to this survey. This data was collected in August 2023. This document includes quantitative data

Files

Institutions

University of Washington

Categories

Implementation of Change

Funding

National Institutes of Health

5P50CA244432

Licence