THE POLITICAL THEOLOGY OF TERRORISM : POSTCOLONIAL CONTEXTS, IDEOLOGICAL VIOLENCE, AND THE LIMITS OF THE ‘RELIGION-NEUTRAL’ NARRATIVE
Description
Abstract: This article interrogates the widely circulated aphorism “terrorism has no religion” through a critical, empirically grounded, and postcolonial lens. Drawing on global terrorism databases—principally the Global Terrorism Database (GTD 2023) and data from the Uppsala Conflict Data Program (UCDP, 2023)—the study demonstrates that over 67% of terrorism-related fatalities since 1970 have been associated with actors claiming explicit religious or ideological authorization (Schmid, 2011; Hoffman, 2006). Moreover, postcolonial regions—South Asia, the Middle East, North Africa, and parts of Sub-Saharan Africa—account for almost 76% of all attacks documented between 2001 and 2021 (GTD, 2023; Laqueur, 2001). Such patterns underscore that terrorism frequently emerges in spaces marked by the historical residues of colonial partition, ethnoreligious reordering, and the political manipulation of identity (Chatterjee, 1993; Dirks, 2001; Pandey, 1990). The article does not argue that religion inherently produces violence; rather, it analyzes how religious imaginaries, sacred narratives, martyrdom myths, notions of divine election, and eschatological visions become instrumentalized by political actors (Cavanaugh, 2009; Asad, 2018). Postcolonial theorists such as Fanon (1963), Mbembe (2003), and Spivak (as discussed in postcolonial identity debates) have shown that colonial domination often reconfigures communities around rigid religious identities; this article extends that claim to examine how modern extremist formations mobilize these identities to authorize terror (Gerges, 2016; Jackson, 2005). Through comparative case studies of Islamist, Christian, Zionist, Hindu nationalist, and atheistic-Marxist violence, the study demonstrates that extremist movements construct a theologically or ideologically sacred mandate that legitimizes coercion, exclusion, and domination (Berger, 2016; Rapoport, 2004; Campedelli et al., 2021; Jaffrelot, 2021; Pappé, 2006). The paper concludes that while terrorism is never reducible to theology alone, the claim that “terrorism has no religion” is analytically insufficient and politically evasive. It obscures the documented reality that both religious and secular ideologies can be weaponized into systems of terror (Arendt, 1951; Snyder, 2010; Moghaddam, 2005). Recognizing these patterns is essential for developing historically grounded and culturally sensitive counter-terrorism strategies (Crenshaw, 1981; Gelvin, 2011; World Values Survey, 2022; ICSR, 2022).
Files
Steps to reproduce
Conclusion: In this study, I have critically reassessed the widespread claim that “terrorism has no religion” by placing it in a richer historical, ideological, and postcolonial frame. Contrary to the simplicity of that slogan, the evidence—both quantitative and qualitative—demonstrates that extremist violence often draws deeply on religious or ideological narratives, sacralizing political goals in ways that cannot be ignored (Cavanaugh 2009; Asad 2018). At the same time, extremism is not exclusively rooted in religion: secular ideologies such as Marxism–Leninism, Maoism, or totalitarianism have functioned as political theologies, shaping their own cosmologies of violence (Arendt 1951; Snyder 2010). By comparing Islamist, Christian, Zionist, Hindu-nationalist, and atheistic/Marxist movements, this paper revealed striking structural and psychological parallels. All employ mythic or doctrinal frameworks—chosenness, purity, martyrdom, eschatology—that justify violence as necessary, redemptive, or divinely sanctioned (Hoffman 2006; Berger 2016). These narratives do not arise in a vacuum. Many extremist movements are born in postcolonial contexts, where colonial border-making, partition, racial governance, and decolonization have reshaped identities and power relations (Chatterjee 1993; Dirks 2001; Mbembe 2003). The historical trauma associated with colonialism, state violence, and contested nationhood plays a profound role in the rise and appeal of extremist ideologies (Fanon 1963; Pandey 1990; Pappé 2006). The persistent reliance on the slogan “terrorism has no religion” is more than a moral platitude: it is a political act. It functions rhetorically to deflect communal blame, depoliticize state responsibility, and simplify complex problems into non-threatening moral abstractions (Jackson 2005). While it may be socially stabilizing in the short term, it risks erasing the ideological dimension of terror, thereby limiting the scope of effective counter-terror measures (Schmid 2011). Therefore, I propose a refined understanding:
Institutions
- Bangabasi Morning College