American Journal of Orthodontics & Dentofacial Orthopedics

Data from a clinical trial comparing resin-modified glass ionomer cement to light-cure composite for orthodontic bonding

Raw data on the age, sex and CVM code, CVM stage and CVM score

The 20 smile images evaluated in the study.

Questionnaire answers based on a patients watching videos presenting orthodontic treatment consent information with or without a humorous script.

The .vbr file necessary to carry on the tracing of the cervical vertebrae

Research data

Raw data for "External Apical Root Resorption and Vectors of Orthodontic Tooth Movement" by Eric Linkous, Edward Harris, and Terry Trojan

Research data

This prospective study investigated the validity of automated digital PAR scoring by comparing conventional measurement using study models to computer-based automated scoring using either scanned study models or intra-oral scanning. Methods: Sixty-seven patients underwent alginate impression-taking and intra-oral scanning (Carestream CS 3600) at a single appointment in a random order. For each patient, a weighted PAR score was calculated manually by a calibrated examiner using study models and a PAR ruler (Conventional), and automatically using Carestream Model+ software and data from scanned study models (Indirect Digital) or intra-oral scans (Direct Digital). All procedures were timed and each patient completed a short binary questionnaire relating to their experience.

Database